To me offering 5 yrs with an option in year 6 should be governed by the 6 yr minimum. It's a 6 year contract. The upside is you get the possible advantage of only paying half salary in year 6 if you decide to buy out the last year. You shouldn't also get a discount in year 6 if you decide to keep the player for that final year. Why wouldn't everyone just utilize the option year if that was the case. If I want to sign a player to 3 years, offer a 2 year contract at 1 mil per with an option year and get a discount on year 3.
I agree with you, but I think we should resolve this asap. If the option year does not count toward the determination of minimum salary offers then everyone would offer the option in order to get an additional year at the lower price. I would prefer to avoid this loophole,
so I am going to exercise my prerogative as commissioner to say that the option year counts as an additional year. Mykbr1 needs to revise his offer to RANDY AROZARENA to four years plus an option (5 total) at $4 mil a year OR five years plus an option (6 total) at $5 mil a year.
sociophil