I don't know you, ColFalkland, but I appreciate that you responded. When you start a thread like this with no other explanation or reason you should certainly expect some of the comments you received.
Having played the board game for most of my life (starting with the 1968 set), I agree that there is absolutely no comparison between the board game and either the computer or online games. With the board game you have absolute, total control over every move.
As you've learned the online game (which is based on the computer game and features the same HAL in both) does not give you the same level of control. But HAL's interesting habits affect all players - ie, we are all playing under the same rules and the same HAL, so the playing field is even.
I like the idea of competing with lots of great friends online, getting experience and learning how to maximize my chances at winning, sharing successes and learning from failures, lamenting HAL's foibles, using our modest buying power to help influence changes for the positive, etc.
The online game is not the board game. I don't think of myself as a field manager when playing the online game, but more of a general manager. There are certainly lots of GMs who disagree with their manager's decisions - but I know, we can't fire HAL lol.
If the online game is not for you then its not for you, no harm no foul. I happen to enjoy all three versions of strat play, as each has it's own appeal to me.
Good luck to you,
charlie