Do CF suffer on D when moved to LF or RF

[ojom24]

I'm looking for a .50 CF that can play LF or RF and was wondering if they suffered when moved to RF or LF since they only show being able to play CF on their card. I would think they wouldn't bc CF is harder to play than the corners but you never know.

[MoCrash]

In the CDROM version, there's usually no penalty to moving CFs to the corner, but the TSN/SOM game won't allow you to put a player in the line-up into a position for which he is not rated.

[kaina7]

I miss the days of allowing a CF to play a corner spot and not lose their defense. RF to CF was one range higher (rf-1 to a cf-2). I thought LF to CF was two ranges higher (lf-2 to a cf-4). LF to RF was one range higher as well.

[bleacher_creature]

[quote:ab6f7f49af="kaina7"]I miss the days of allowing a CF to play a corner spot and not lose their defense. RF to CF was one range higher (rf-1 to a cf-2). I thought LF to CF was two ranges higher (lf-2 to a cf-4). LF to RF was one range higher as well.[/quote:ab6f7f49af]

This is allowed in the board game. The only way HAL would use that CF here is if you were totally out of players at that position.

[kaina7]

Yeah, bleacher creature. I was talking about the days when we played the board game in college. One of the favorite moves in the late 80's was to move Jesse Barfield to play a cf-2(-4) from his rf-1(-4) position.