Hey PCZ, this is a hard sell for the bottom part of your league. Without any access to FAs to help some teams, I don't know if you will get enough team owners in this league. The bottom 4 teams in this league will have a rough time staying competitive against the Yanks and other top tier teams. You may allow a couple FAs from the unselected teams to give other team owners incentive to join this league.
Good luck.
Kev
Another Real Teams League
by pineapple7 » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:40 pm
1. pczar-Detroit Tigers (Comerica)
2. FletchGriswold - Minnesota Twins (Metrodome)
3. Branham Biggers-Mets (Shea)
4. Dave Carroll - Cardinals
5. A'sWinTheSeries - Yankees
6 gbcaraballo - LA Angels
7. pineapple7 - Mariners
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
2. FletchGriswold - Minnesota Twins (Metrodome)
3. Branham Biggers-Mets (Shea)
4. Dave Carroll - Cardinals
5. A'sWinTheSeries - Yankees
6 gbcaraballo - LA Angels
7. pineapple7 - Mariners
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
- pineapple7
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by paul.czarnecki » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:24 pm
I'm open to suggestions on allowing free agents. As long as things don't get too complicated.
- paul.czarnecki
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by BRANHAMBIGGERS » Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:08 pm
Up to two or three free agents who are former members of your base team, or just became members of your base team? As long as they are not on the base roster of any other teams in the league???
- BRANHAMBIGGERS
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by paul.czarnecki » Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:20 am
[quote:1cbcde94a7="Branham Biggers"]Up to two or three free agents who are former members of your base team, or just became members of your base team? As long as they are not on the base roster of any other teams in the league???[/quote:1cbcde94a7]
Sounds good to me. Or we could allow up to three free agents who are not on the base roster of any other teams in the league. I'm flexible.
Sounds good to me. Or we could allow up to three free agents who are not on the base roster of any other teams in the league. I'm flexible.
- paul.czarnecki
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by paul.czarnecki » Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:37 am
I took the liberty of adding Fillies2, who I think is in.
1. pczar-Detroit Tigers (Comerica)
2. FletchGriswold - Minnesota Twins (Metrodome)
3. Branham Biggers-Mets (Shea)
4. Dave Carroll - Cardinals
5. A'sWinTheSeries - Yankees
6 gbcaraballo - LA Angels
7. pineapple7 - Mariners
8. fillies2 - D'backs
9.
10.
11.
12.
1. pczar-Detroit Tigers (Comerica)
2. FletchGriswold - Minnesota Twins (Metrodome)
3. Branham Biggers-Mets (Shea)
4. Dave Carroll - Cardinals
5. A'sWinTheSeries - Yankees
6 gbcaraballo - LA Angels
7. pineapple7 - Mariners
8. fillies2 - D'backs
9.
10.
11.
12.
- paul.czarnecki
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by paul.czarnecki » Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:50 am
Here's how the first two divisions would shake out so far
Yankees 97-65
Mets 97-65
Twins 96-66
Tigers 95-67
Angels 89-73
Cardinals 83-78
Mariners 78-84
D'backs 76-86
Yankees 97-65
Mets 97-65
Twins 96-66
Tigers 95-67
Angels 89-73
Cardinals 83-78
Mariners 78-84
D'backs 76-86
- paul.czarnecki
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by gstanis » Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:30 am
1. pczar-Detroit Tigers (Comerica)
2. FletchGriswold - Minnesota Twins (Metrodome)
3. Branham Biggers-Mets (Shea)
4. Dave Carroll - Cardinals
5. A'sWinTheSeries - Yankees
6 gbcaraballo - LA Angels
7. pineapple7 - Mariners
8. fillies2 - D'backs
9. gstanis - Phillies
10.
11.
12.
2. FletchGriswold - Minnesota Twins (Metrodome)
3. Branham Biggers-Mets (Shea)
4. Dave Carroll - Cardinals
5. A'sWinTheSeries - Yankees
6 gbcaraballo - LA Angels
7. pineapple7 - Mariners
8. fillies2 - D'backs
9. gstanis - Phillies
10.
11.
12.
- gstanis
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball Online 20xx
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests