Thank you Glen for getting back to me with your methodolgy and thank you TeamNasty for bringing some rationality back into this thread. It reached its nadir with Shinsational's extensive post further telling me he how he fels about me and my positngs instead of adding to the discussion about bullpen usage. I think he missed my original point that it doesn't matter to me what some random person a message baord thinks of me. Shinsational is certianly entitled to his opinion but I am also just as entitled to not put any stock in it whatsoever.
But anyway is there a possibly of employing the mega closer theory while reinforcing the rest of the pen to provide solid, if unspectacular, supporting relief in order to avoid those blow out losses? Basically if you had several middle of the road ($1-$3) releivers who were more evenly balanced to eat up the innings that came up when your starter got knocked out early then that would prevent getting blown and possibly allowing you to stay in games while giving your offense a chance to come back.
I guess the issue with that though is, as Glen alluded to, money. If you are going to spend $6 on a mega closer and field a respectable starting rotation then that doesn't leave a lot in the kitty for extra middle of the road relievers. But I would be interested to see how things would work out with a team based in a hitters' park that went with a very inexpensive startign rotation (say $8-10 total) and then employed the mega closer with a couple of stronger complementry relievers to go along with him.
Thereby acknowleding that your starters would at best get through five good innings but then turn it over to a bullpen that actually had superior abilites than the starters themselves. So say if your starter went five and gave up five runs but then your bullpen gave up only one more and even no more runs then you'd have a good chance to win every game given that you would have a very strong offense in place that should be able to score 6 or 7 runs a game. It would be a system based more on cosistency than trying to win only those games that are close while just giving up on any games that started to get out of hand.