TROUBLE in PARADISE ----AGAIN
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:24 amNo New games? :x
Vats a Matta Now? :roll:
Vats a Matta Now? :roll:
Archive of SportingNews.com's old SOM Baseball forum
http://forum-365.strat-o-matic.com/archivesn/
TROUBLE in PARADISE ----AGAIN
http://forum-365.strat-o-matic.com/archivesn/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=581079
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:24 amPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:12 amLots of chatter about this on the "New Leagues" discussion on the ATG message board.
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:41 amThe new muchly anticipated 1999 season starts off with a "clunk"!
I don't recall being at .500 after the 1st night of the season. I used to think it was mathematically impossible. However, after league-wide rainouts, we're all 0-0.
Kev
I don't recall being at .500 after the 1st night of the season. I used to think it was mathematically impossible. However, after league-wide rainouts, we're all 0-0.
Kev
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:14 am[quote:8bbc2fb846="ehlekev"]The new muchly anticipated 1999 season starts off with a "clunk"!
I don't recall being at .500 after the 1st night of the season. I used to think it was mathematically impossible. However, after league-wide rainouts, we're all 0-0.
Kev[/quote:8bbc2fb846]
Any communication from TSN on this on [b:8bbc2fb846]ANY [/b:8bbc2fb846]of the boards??? Do they even know?
I don't recall being at .500 after the 1st night of the season. I used to think it was mathematically impossible. However, after league-wide rainouts, we're all 0-0.
Kev[/quote:8bbc2fb846]
Any communication from TSN on this on [b:8bbc2fb846]ANY [/b:8bbc2fb846]of the boards??? Do they even know?
No games in two new 70s leagues
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:43 amStrange that there's no response from SOM.
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:42 amLooks like they just ran the games.
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:14 amHey everyone.
This one's on me. It was related to the recent new feature that runs the draft as soon as leagues are filled. To prevent those mid-day drafted leagues from raising errors complaining that they were already run for that day, I put in an instruction into the start of the midnight league processing system to ignore them. Unfortunately for some reason it ignored opening day leagues as well.
So it's my fault, and I share all your frustrations; yeah, I'm fed up with myself for my recent bouts of carelessness. The problem is I've been trying to knock your socks off with all these new upgrades and features that apparently I'm not taking the time to make sure they are each 100% polished. I mean, I do a LOT of testing on them and don't release them until I have a lot of confidence in them, but still I should know better than to make some of the assumptions I've been making. I hope this doesn't sound like an excuse - if I can't handle it I shouldn't be doing so much.
I'm going to put in extra failsafes (on top of the many that I already have) that will page me if something so much as sneezes. For instance, there's a check to make sure midnight processing runs successfully, and there's a check to see if any individual leagues have a problem. So I'll put a new one in that goes through every league in the system and makes sure it's where it needs to be.
Anyway. Take it for what it's worth. The sense of urgency is not lost on me.
This one's on me. It was related to the recent new feature that runs the draft as soon as leagues are filled. To prevent those mid-day drafted leagues from raising errors complaining that they were already run for that day, I put in an instruction into the start of the midnight league processing system to ignore them. Unfortunately for some reason it ignored opening day leagues as well.
So it's my fault, and I share all your frustrations; yeah, I'm fed up with myself for my recent bouts of carelessness. The problem is I've been trying to knock your socks off with all these new upgrades and features that apparently I'm not taking the time to make sure they are each 100% polished. I mean, I do a LOT of testing on them and don't release them until I have a lot of confidence in them, but still I should know better than to make some of the assumptions I've been making. I hope this doesn't sound like an excuse - if I can't handle it I shouldn't be doing so much.
I'm going to put in extra failsafes (on top of the many that I already have) that will page me if something so much as sneezes. For instance, there's a check to make sure midnight processing runs successfully, and there's a check to see if any individual leagues have a problem. So I'll put a new one in that goes through every league in the system and makes sure it's where it needs to be.
Anyway. Take it for what it's worth. The sense of urgency is not lost on me.
no real problem
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:23 am"Games were run this morning no big deal. 1999 looks pretty good although my teams don't
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:41 amI would have preferred not running the games. 0-0 is better than my 1-2 start. Thanks Bernie for getting back with us.
Kev
Kev
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:59 amAnd my 1999 Larry Walker went down for 10 games....