Page 1 of 1

Defense, throwing arm

PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:30 pm
by Knerrpool
I know you generally want to play the person at the position first on their card. For outfielders, however, can I assume that if they have the same defensive rating for either of the other two outfield positions that it wouldn't make any difference? Also, I assume the arm rating is the same regardless of which position they are in? Thanks.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:11 pm
by AeroDave10
Yes and yes. For example Andre Ethier (3e2) is just as good in LF and RF, and his arm is a -2 at both. Obviously, if you have Ethier and Nick Swisher (3(+1)e9), you want to start Ethier in RF and Swisher in LF to take advantage of the better throwing arm in RF.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:02 pm
by The Turtle
Actually, I believe the biggest benefit is to have the strongest arm in CF.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:47 pm
by AeroDave10
[quote:db6cdd8042="The Turtle"]Actually, I believe the biggest benefit is to have the strongest arm in CF.[/quote:db6cdd8042]

Why is that? Is there evidence that more hit chances (e.g. single(cf)) exist for CF over RF?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:55 pm
by the splinter
all straight singles and doubles (no *'s) are directed to the CF'er

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:57 pm
by the splinter
also in the board(super advanced) game OF's arm are adjusted for throws to certain bases(check me on this)...it may be the case here as well. I remember this being discussed a few years back

I am sure Dean can clarify for us.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:41 am
by AeroDave10
[quote:15826541c4="the splinter"]all straight singles and doubles (no *'s) are directed to the CF'er[/quote:15826541c4]

That's not true at all. I DO think the doubles that are not specifically directed to a particular outfielder go to CF, but there are plenty of single and double chances with no *'s that go to RF and LF.

Flipping through a bunch of cards, I have not yet seen a single with no *'s that is not directed to an outfielder.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:17 am
by Mean Dean
If the outfielder to whom the ball is hit isn't specified, it's assumed to be the CF. Maybe that's what [b:b58391c4b9]splinter[/b:b58391c4b9] meant.

Runners attempting to go from 1st to 3rd on hits to RF add 10% to their chances. Runners attempting to go from 1st to 3rd on hits to LF subtract 10% from their chances.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:23 pm
by the splinter
thank you Dean...you are correct in your assumption about my assupmtiom

and I knew would get clarification on the arm adjustment as well.

you sir are the SOM rules guru

Thanks 8-)