Page 1 of 1

Closer Broxton Starts Game...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:04 am
by robwrjr
...pitches 8 2/3 innings since the fifth starter was injured. Gotta love this game for the opposing team. Unreal.

[code:1:ed886e87f9]Rehabilitators IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
J.Broxton WIN(1-0) 8 2/3 5 4 4 4 10 1 129 2.70
H.Kuo 0 1/3 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 4.00
Totals 9 5 4 4 5 10 1[/code:1:ed886e87f9]

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:55 am
by robwrjr
No thinks this is unacceptable?

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:33 am
by keyzick
Unreal and unbelievable...yes. Unacceptable? No, I don't mind it. With some of the limitations involved with rosters, salaries, etc...the occasional (but very infrequent) reliever starting is just a quirk of the game.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:09 am
by apolivka
129 pitches for Broxton is pretty unrealistic, and would never happen in real life. But, HAL doesn't really know that.

I'd like to see a link to that game. I assume when relievers get put in as starters, they are an S5, so I wonder when his fatigue numbers starting rising. I assume Broxton normally would be set at "slow hook", so a very strange game, but I don't think it's a big problem.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:40 pm
by padrenurgle1
I saw Bruce Sutter start 3 games one season in 70s, and in at least one of those games he threw a shutout. If you have a very small staff and no SP/RPs on the roster, and a starter goes down, there is no other option. One of the pure relievers has to start. What fatigue factor is operative is an interesting question.