Page 1 of 2
Interpretation problem
Posted:
Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:20 pm
by dseuss
I must not be reading the inning description below right, but it looks to me that Posada hit a single with two out and Gonzalez on 1st, Gonzalez on first got out (not sure how), and Posada went to second. Obviously, this is not possible. What am I missing?
*** BOTTOM OF INNING 3 ***
0 J.Gerut 5-12 Ground Out (1B) b-0 gb(1B)x F9
1 D.Lee 6-9 Single (LF) b-1 F9
1 1 C.Gonzalez h&r Force Play (SS) 1-o b-1 gb(SS)x F9
2 1 J.Posada 2-10 Single (RF) 1-o b-2 bpSI 1-19 F9
Posted:
Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:31 pm
by MARCPELLETIER
I take it to mean that Gonzalez was harpooned at third trying to advance. I know that, in such situations, we wouldn't give Posada an extra base on scoring cards, but seems like Strat forgot about that.
Posted:
Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:17 am
by the splinter
this was a BP single
aren't all BP single*(advance 1 base)?
Posted:
Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:00 am
by bernieh
With the [url=http://somonline.bluwiki.com/go/Maximum_rule:_More_baserunning_decisions]"More baserunning decisions" Maximum Rule[/url], advancing an extra base on a SINGLE* is possible.
Also, MW: I thought that on any play at 3rd on a runner trying to take an extra base, the trail runner (in this case the batter Posada) automatically takes 2nd. Am I mistaken?
Posted:
Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:28 pm
by chasenally
On third out the runner from first would reach third before the batter would reach second. Runner at thrid is tagged out before batter reaches second so he is not credited with the extra base. Small detail for this game. It really doesn't matter. Mike
Posted:
Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:53 pm
by MARCPELLETIER
Bernie, I believe that any runner reaches safely a base only if all runners in front also have reached safely a base. In case both runners are at the same base, the trail runner is out.
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:05 am
by Spider 67
How aboutif the throw to third got away and Gonzalez tried to score and was nailed at home. Then, runner would have advanced to second before out was made at home. Lead runner would have safely advanced to third before making the final out at home.
Rundown
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:36 am
by jdmercha
Gonzalez could have been caught in a rundown between 2nd and 3rd, giving Posada time to reach 2nd.
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:44 pm
by bernieh
Ah, I was confused about what the real question was.
Although I think it's agreed it isn't a big deal, the last 2 posts above are possible explanations for Posada reaching 2nd before the 3rd out was made. But I think the game engine simply followed the "play at 3rd on the runner" board game rule I was talking about, whereby the trail runner automatically advances to 2nd no matter what happens to the runner going to 3rd... 3 outs be damned.
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:45 pm
by MARCPELLETIER
splinter,
I made a countdown that I published a year ago (probably in the strategy pages, about findings I did while playing the disc).
If my memory serves well, roughly 60% of all single* or single** become single + decision...that's at least how it is on the CDrom.