ATG VI New Card Batch #6: holdouts

[The Last Druid]

I agree completely. But if you want to deal with scarcity in the draft, the lottery element is most prominent there.

Personally I consider 200M drafts more like checkers... :wink: :P

[Valen]

the last two posts make good well reasoned and stated points.

What it boils down to for me though is that even if I agreed there were too many cards I do not see any cards other than what I consider to be the bogus fantasim cards I would be in favor of removing. I certainly would not want any of my favorites to be removed. And would not be in favor of yours being removed, especially if it meant you went after my favorites instead. :lol: Call me selfish.

So only solution I can see is those who like all the cards use the full set and those that don't start up a subset league. Creating a NL or AL only effectively cuts the player pool in half. And perhaps the site rebuild will provide even more subset choices.

[doug_tucker10]

You get scarcity to draft with the 60M cap leagues, more of a challenge. It's not just how many players are available in the pool its also how much talent you can actually have on your roster.

[nevdully's]

Go Fish.

[andycummings65]

[quote:274aff2fe5]Everybody's missing the point. The damage already has been done. Arky Vaughn is in the set and is now THE BEST HITTER. That's a problem. Also, in the right context, he's very underpriced. The card needs to be removed. [/quote:274aff2fe5]

I agree with what one of the nels52's said.

[Valen]

I too agree Arky needs to be removed. Though I could live with having the card around if we just had a target date deadline for getting all these fantasim cards replaced with whatever version is currently shipping on the cdrom game.

[WeatherNut]

[quote:776c2ead36]My question for Bernie is will any more cards be added to new card batch #6 to replace the Elliott and Miller cards? If so, how about Darrell Evans '73 and Bobby Murcer '71?
[/quote:776c2ead36]

I like those 2. Especially the Murcer card. :D

WN