Page 1 of 1

Can Anyone Explain this?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:47 pm
by bsolheim
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/stratomatic/playoffs/boxscore.html?group_id=138089&g_id=976

check out ninth inning madness

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:55 pm
by OakAth72
Forward it to NASA and let their computers take a crack at it.....

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:40 pm
by scorehouse
obama only had 4.9 trillion to spend. not enuff left for NASA. sorry. :?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:51 pm
by rburgh
ROFL. Glad you won the game. This is the funniest thing I have seen on this site yet. All it had to do was leave Torriente in the game to play CF, bring in Fox at 2nd and put Dandridge at 3rd, leave Petrocelli in at SS, and let Boudreau catch.

Did you have Helton set as a defensive replacement? How about Wright for Valentine?

If you had those two, then everything else makes sense. FIRST it makes the defensive replacements you want, then (all the stuff after Sutter) it fills the hole in CF and makes a chain of forced moves afterwards.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:21 am
by Palanion
Damn that's funny. HAL hits for C and 3B and decides to leave those hitters in the game. So, Goslin who hit for C stays in and Petrocelli who hit for 3b stays in.
HAL moves Boudreau to C to put Petro at ss; puts Goslin in lf, which moves Wright to rf; now Valentine is out of the lineup and so Helton takes that spot and plays 1b with Foxx moving to 3b. Done.
Whoops... no, wait... I can understand the idea that Fox, Boudreau, Dandridge makes a better infield defense. And HAL does so at the expense of lf, rf, and c. interesting.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:26 am
by george barnard
[quote:42ca6cd370]All it had to do was leave Torriente in the game to play CF[/quote:42ca6cd370]

Hal couldn't do that because Torriente the PH was pinch-hit for by Petrocelli when Hernandez came in to pitch.

Besides, that would have made sense.

Bill