Teasers or normalization queries?
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:46 pmWhat does the community want for Bernie's current agenda to be: Get out the promised teasers and batch of new cards or ask Richman about normalization?
Archive of SportingNews.com's old SOM Baseball forum
http://forum-365.strat-o-matic.com/archivesn/
Teasers or normalization queries?
http://forum-365.strat-o-matic.com/archivesn/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=627007
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:46 pmPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:21 pmI'm for new cards and card teasers
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:50 pmId actually like both- but Im kinda like that.
However new cards for me takes precedence by a lot.
My question would be this: If we have to ask Strat hq bout weather normalization is on-
how in the heck would we know if things like Doubles and Triples in Ball parks were being used or not?
I mean, I really dont want to forego new things coming to us- that is very very very imortant to me-
but Im just not clear bout which things we know and which are speculation.
and again- please please please do not divert time away from getting the new cards up.
Id rather leave my question unanswered.
However new cards for me takes precedence by a lot.
My question would be this: If we have to ask Strat hq bout weather normalization is on-
how in the heck would we know if things like Doubles and Triples in Ball parks were being used or not?
I mean, I really dont want to forego new things coming to us- that is very very very imortant to me-
but Im just not clear bout which things we know and which are speculation.
and again- please please please do not divert time away from getting the new cards up.
Id rather leave my question unanswered.
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:48 pmSalt
A few years ago when the boards were up in arms about the same thing I had noticed that Robin Yount did not perform well for me in the doubles and triples department when I played in Polo 34 (1-1 19-19). After looking at the data on Diamond Dope, indeed he averaged less doubles and triples there per 700 PA's then he did other parks.
Diamond Dope should be able to prove or disprove your question.
A few years ago when the boards were up in arms about the same thing I had noticed that Robin Yount did not perform well for me in the doubles and triples department when I played in Polo 34 (1-1 19-19). After looking at the data on Diamond Dope, indeed he averaged less doubles and triples there per 700 PA's then he did other parks.
Diamond Dope should be able to prove or disprove your question.
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:56 pm[quote:c0b230a54f="jet40"]Salt
A few years ago when the boards were up in arms about the same thing I had noticed that Robin Yount did not perform well for me in the doubles and triples department when I played in Polo 34 (1-1 19-19). After looking at the data on Diamond Dope, indeed he averaged less doubles and triples there per 700 PA's then he did other parks.
Diamond Dope should be able to prove or disprove your question.[/quote:c0b230a54f]
Well I do think thats a great suggestion to research.
But wouldnt it be better to just have the doubles/triples ratings along with the HR ratings rather than me having to research each park to figure out if a) it is turned on and b) what the actual numbers are?
A few years ago when the boards were up in arms about the same thing I had noticed that Robin Yount did not perform well for me in the doubles and triples department when I played in Polo 34 (1-1 19-19). After looking at the data on Diamond Dope, indeed he averaged less doubles and triples there per 700 PA's then he did other parks.
Diamond Dope should be able to prove or disprove your question.[/quote:c0b230a54f]
Well I do think thats a great suggestion to research.
But wouldnt it be better to just have the doubles/triples ratings along with the HR ratings rather than me having to research each park to figure out if a) it is turned on and b) what the actual numbers are?
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:01 pmThere are definitely doubles and triples effects. I too would love a park breakdown on these or even empirical data if not the park settings.
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:36 pmHow about some info (or teasers) on the upcoming revamping of the mystery card games?
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:42 pmConsidering I am in the skeptic crowd when it comes to normalization I would prefer something real like teasers instead of investigation of grassy knoll theories.
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:12 pm[quote:eec1b74325]Considering I am in the skeptic crowd when it comes to normalization I would prefer something real like teasers instead of investigation of grassy knoll theories.[/quote:eec1b74325]
What he said.
WN
What he said.
WN