Bud Black was injured facing Richie Zisk. The result of the AB was a lineout vs Zisk, a RH hitter. Below are Black's possible 6-12 results vs a RH batter:
84 - strikeout
85 - SI
89 - # (BPHR)
90 - FB(rf)X
91 - FB(rf)X
Based on that there is no possible year for a lineout. However I suspect that the 85 year is more than just SI. It is probably
SI 1-10
lineout 11-20
or something like that. The complete description of that roll must not be visable on the TSN SOM card.
What do you think?
Incomplete Card Descriptions?
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Incomplete Card Descriptions?
by LMBombers » Sun Dec 25, 2005 6:21 am
Last edited by LMBombers on Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LMBombers
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by bjs73 » Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:12 am
[quote:cbdc0c14a3]Bud Black was injured facing Richie Zisk. The result of the AB was a lineout vs Zisk, a RH hitter. Below are Black's possible 6-12 results vs a RH batter:[/quote:cbdc0c14a3]
Hey :!: :?: Aren't I the owner of Bud Black in this scenario that you're describing? :twisted: You doing some research? :wink:
[quote:cbdc0c14a3]Based on that there is no possible year for a lineout. However I suspect that the 85 year is more than just SI. It is probably
SI 1-10
lineout 11-20
or something like that. The complete description of that roll must not be visable on the TSN SOM card.
What do you think?[/quote:cbdc0c14a3]
Actually the whole thing kind of struck me as odd also. I reallly didn't have an answer for it myself when I saw it. However, I think that you're pretty spot on in your analysis. RFX rolls can't result in a lineout. So the only logical thing left is the single roll.
But if I was a betting man, I'd bet that 6-12 vs. right in that situation is actually a ballpark single that was neglected in the online version. <
What do you think?
Oh and also, Merry Christmas!
Hey :!: :?: Aren't I the owner of Bud Black in this scenario that you're describing? :twisted: You doing some research? :wink:
[quote:cbdc0c14a3]Based on that there is no possible year for a lineout. However I suspect that the 85 year is more than just SI. It is probably
SI 1-10
lineout 11-20
or something like that. The complete description of that roll must not be visable on the TSN SOM card.
What do you think?[/quote:cbdc0c14a3]
Actually the whole thing kind of struck me as odd also. I reallly didn't have an answer for it myself when I saw it. However, I think that you're pretty spot on in your analysis. RFX rolls can't result in a lineout. So the only logical thing left is the single roll.
But if I was a betting man, I'd bet that 6-12 vs. right in that situation is actually a ballpark single that was neglected in the online version. <
What do you think?
Oh and also, Merry Christmas!
- bjs73
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by LMBombers » Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:44 am
No one has an answer as to what year the lineout vs RH batter could be?
Does anyone have a Bud Black 1985 actual SOM card to see what a roll of 6-12 vs RH batter is?
I have always been a little sceptical when I see a roll result of only SI. If it was simply a single with one base advance it would look like this SINGLE*.
I think all SI results on the TSN virtual SOM cards are not the complete description.
Does anyone have a Bud Black 1985 actual SOM card to see what a roll of 6-12 vs RH batter is?
I have always been a little sceptical when I see a roll result of only SI. If it was simply a single with one base advance it would look like this SINGLE*.
I think all SI results on the TSN virtual SOM cards are not the complete description.
- LMBombers
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by Panzer ace » Mon Dec 26, 2005 2:28 pm
Could Hal have doing a H&R or bunt? wouldnt this change the strikeout? What do the charts say?
- Panzer ace
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: '70s, '80s, '90s
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests