by honestiago1 » Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:11 pm
You can never tell what folks are going to do, but the things that always work well in strat (and in real life, too, for the most part):
Fielding in the middle (if they can hit, great); Think too many folks shy away from 2's at SS and 2B. If you can get a middle IF that hits substantially better than a light-hitting 1, do it. This makes gold glove middle IF's who can smack it VERY valuable (IF you can get them).
Leadoff men: The three best (IMHO) are Raines, Henderson and Butler. They have usuable cards down the line, can field, steal bases, get on base and run. I think anyone else is a crap shoot (though I could certainly be forgetting someone -- non-traditional leadoffs like Downing, or even DwEvans).
Corners and LF: It'd be nice to have hoovers here, but not necessary. This is where you stick those big bats with iron gloves.
Bullpen: You can gamble a lot with .75 middle relievers, hoping to get the good year, then dumping them when they don't work out. I think a decent save man is a must -- UNLESS you somehow get a super rotation.
All this hogwash aside, it seems to me it's always better to go with a philosophy and stick to it. If you're going to go for "speed/pitching," do that. If it's Weaver-ball (wait for the 3-run HR), draft accordingly. I had a wishy-washy philosophy in my ATG II league, and was muddling. I dumped a bunch of high price sluggers, got another fantastic pitching arm, picked up a bunch of cheap hitters who smacked around .290, could field, bunt, H&R and run, and my team went from 2 games below .500 to 4 over. They may not stay there (my hitters are REALLY mediocre by league standards), but I know what my philosophy is ("we are what we are," as Greg Popovich always says of his supposedly boring Spurs team).