Any idea how to prevent this?

Our Mystery Card games - The '70s Game, Back to the '80s, Back to the '90s

Any idea how to prevent this?

Postby ths92110 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:31 pm

My power slob team is ahead 3-0 on the road at the Oakland Coliseum. The only defensive substitution I have set is for McAuliffe (2b-2 e16) to replace Harmon (2b-3 e9) at 2nd. In the bottom of the 8th HAL brings in McAuliffe, then on his own volition sends Dick Allen from 3b to 1b (3b-4 e38; 1b-4 e14), Don Buford from LF to 3b (lf-3(0) e4; 3b-4 e23), and Otto Velez from 1b to LF (1b-4 e24; lf-4(+1) e9). Yes, he has improved the defense at the corners. But in my opinion this not justified given the loss in LF. Can anyone tell me how to stop this? There are several small ball parks in my league and I'd like to prevent it from happening again. Or is HAL right, and his fielding arrangement statistically better?????

Here's the link:

[url]http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/70s/league/boxscore.html?group_id=14641&g_id=152[/url]

Thanks!
ths92110
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby franky35 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:39 pm

HAL's substitutions will result in 20 fewer errors over the season vs. going from a 3 to a 4 in LF. I think that is very close to even. Personally, I'd go with HALs configuration. But either way, I'd prefer to have better D at 3rd. Pick up Schmidt if he's available - he's a great fielder and hits lefties pretty well too.
franky35
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ths92110 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:17 pm

Thanks for the response Franky. Which of course leads to another question: Does a player's "e" rating work out to the number of projected errors he will have in a season? And thus the collective "e" rating of the team improved by 20 with HAL's moves?
ths92110
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby coyote303 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:26 pm

[quote:8e86d9f3de="ths92110"]Thanks for the response Franky. Which of course leads to another question: Does a player's "e" rating work out to the number of projected errors he will have in a season? And thus the collective "e" rating of the team improved by 20 with HAL's moves?[/quote:8e86d9f3de]

The e rating is the approximate number of errors you can expect if a player played every inning of every game in the field.

HAL's logic often works out pretty well. But he will use that logic as soon as he makes a requested defensive sub, and I don't think you can stop it.

Coyote
coyote303
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm


Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: '70s, '80s, '90s

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests

cron