Page 2 of 7
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:54 pm
by Sneezedoc
Sign up
1. RJNEWMAN
2. ggrover
3. gorshar
4. gfdwarf
5. AllStarInc
6. Risden
7. franky35
8. ugrant
9 Sneezedoc
10.
11.
12..
I have also forwarded a copy of the last Dan spreadsheet I had from April 16th (close to the end I believe)...please Email me with final instructions...5 players kept for us playoff teams? No kept Stadium? Etc, etc. etc.
JUST A THOUGHT...
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:39 pm
by Risden
[quote:182661e8a5="Rjnewman"]1969 Prehistoric Auction League II
Playoff teams can protect up to 5 players at purchase price from prehistoric I auction
Non Playoff teams can protect up to 10 players at purchase price from last auction
You can protect zero players if you desire[/quote:182661e8a5]
I think that this league's greatest attribute is the DRAFT and its BIDDING Process! While it was my idea that we have teams "protect" either 10 players or 5 players, I would suggest that we change those parameters a bit.
How about something a bit less drastic that would extend our draft a bit AND allow for some more dynamic rosters? I am suggesting: Playoff teams protect up to 3 players while non-playoff teams can protect up to 5 players.
I realize that we all signed up under the 5/10 rule, but if you are all in agreement, could we change the rule to 3/5 (or some other formula) to extend the fun drafting part of the league?
If we can't get agreement on a different number, I am still in the league. Just thought we could change it up a bit before we get any further…
Bob
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Fri Jun 04, 2010 4:33 pm
by franky35
since my team sucked, I would favor any change reducing the number of keepers. So, I'll vote for Bob's suggested change.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:21 pm
by gorshar
I definitely agree with a 3/5 change. I would even support a 1/2 or 1/3 as well and precisely for the reasons Risden gave. Or even no keepers at all... ?
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:40 am
by ggrover15
i like the 3/5 better also.
3-5 IS FINE none is fine
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:24 am
by Rjnewman
we can change officially now if that is desire. Dont see why u cant keep parks though but I will defer to group. If we want to we can start from scratch. Then we dont have to worry about old spread sheet.
Why do any keepers?
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:14 pm
by GFDWARF07
Can we just start fresh - sounds like that would work for others and the first time through was a big experiment anyway, so the keeper idea has less significance. Let's just start fresh?
And as for parks, there are a few that are obviously unique - I would like to see those up for auction again!
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:08 pm
by franky35
fresh start baby (that's my vote)
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:23 am
by gorshar
fresh start works for me.
Anyone up for making the bid limit $80 instead of $100?
Keepers etc. Vote on 80 million cap no keepers
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:50 pm
by Rjnewman
The thought was to penalize playoff teams and reward those that finished out of money and then foster a mentality that one was potentially drafting for the future as well. Should we start fom scratch with an 80 million hard dollar cap to match values with game?I know Gordie would like to start from scratch. Dan will u then take over commisioner duties?I am willing to do what group wants. I am thinking clean slate will be easier to get a fill in if we need it. Bob will u do excel sheet again?