Page 1 of 2
Are F.Peterson and C.Osteen the Pete and Koufax of 69???
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:36 pmby Ruths ruffians
Seriously folks, it's early but I did not expect these numbers from them after 6 games:
I may be shooting myself in the foot here but if it continues this way, I will have to retract my statements about the new 69 league lacking talent.
Fritz Peterson: 2-0 1.84 ERA / 0.95 WHIP
C.Osteen: 2-0 1.13 ERA / 8.81 WHIP
Dean
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/1969/team/team_other.html?user_id=1581
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:44 pmby modmark46
An 8.81 WHIP for Osteen? :)
Sorry, 0.81 whip. WHIP, an 8.81 WHIP. That would be sad...
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pmby Ruths ruffians
0.81
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:24 pmby DOUGGRAY
you are simply lucky early on because their card numbers dont even come close too Pete or Koufax
26 TBs vs RHP makes them are more like Hughson and Covelesky. Please dont insult Pete or Koufax ;)
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:24 pmby PJ Axelsson
:lol:
Actually, Osteen has been stellar for me early on as well!
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2005 11:04 pmby mikemartinfl
too bad they're both lefties (which sometimes spells doom)
Posted:
Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:46 amby genegrid
No....McDowell is the Koufax of '69
Posted:
Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:20 amby STEPHENANDERSON 2
I have similar numbers for both after 9 games... the only problem is my defense and hitting has hurt Olsteen.... Fritz is 2-0 also
Posted:
Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:19 amby Mr Baseball World
.....agree penn but you also have to factor the hitting end of the quotient. Fritz and Osteen will not face Cobb, Mantle Hornsby et al. As such that object in the mirror may be closer than it appears
Posted:
Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:27 amby Treyomo
Tell ya what - I'll call 'em Hubbell and Cicotte.
Now, if I could get Messersmith and Singer to stop pitching like the 2005 versions of Schilling and Mussina.