Page 1 of 13

100M, 20 rnd Live Draft, need 5 more players.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:41 am
by SEANCALHOON
1. 100 Mil Cap
2. DH
3. Waivers
4. 20 rounds, auto rest
5. Lotto determines order, High-to-Low
6. Use Penngray's site, with his permission

Sign up below if interested:

1. Hooner11 - PA
2. Genegrid
3. Martin (msheaf1) - TX
4. bigmahon - NH
5. pope mollusk vi -SC
6. Sykes- NJ
7. CATom - CA
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:04 am
by Coffeeholic
1. Hooner11 - PA
2. Genegrid
3. Martin (msheaf1) - TX
4. bigmahon - NH
5. pope mollusk vi -SC
6. Sykes- NJ
7. CATom - CA
8. Coffee - NY
9.
10.
11.
12.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:30 pm
by FRANKMANSUETO
1. Hooner11 - PA
2. Genegrid
3. Martin (msheaf1) - TX
4. bigmahon - NH
5. pope mollusk vi -SC
6. Sykes- NJ
7. CATom - CA
8. Coffee - NY
9. Frank M- CT
10.
11.
12.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:52 am
by Stephen Lee
1. Hooner11 - PA
2. Genegrid
3. Martin (msheaf1) - TX
4. bigmahon - NH
5. pope mollusk vi -SC
6. Sykes- NJ
7. CATom - CA
8. Coffee - NY
9. Frank M- CT
10. sgl245 - MO
11.
12.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:44 am
by FRANKMANSUETO
Hooner, change the heading to needing 2 to draft. This will draw attention and help fill this . :)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:04 pm
by Coffeeholic
I don't want to rock the boat too much, but want to throw out the following idea: :idea:

I've been involved in a couple of $100 mil 1969 live drafts already and have found that the player pool is probably too shallow to merit $100 mil leagues. I say this for two reasons: 1) Invariably there seem to be a few owners who can not spend $100 mil on meaningful draft choices; 2) $100 mil allows all the significant players to be drafted, thus removing any options as to team make-up and really seems to remove strategic allocation of resources (owners just draft the best available player).

Just some food for thought. :roll:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:30 pm
by SEANCALHOON
Coffee, that is a good idea, as I have done a few as well since first doing this grouping.

I would be open to switching to an $80 Mil. cap if there is sufficient interest.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:39 pm
by novie
Hooner.... if it gets changed to 80M, count me in. I ran the first 100M draft and there is absolutely nothing left over afterwards. In fact, all things considered I am likely going to leave a couple mil unused so I can make a change or two.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:04 pm
by genegrid
1. Hooner11 - PA
2. Genegrid
3. Martin (msheaf1) - TX
4. bigmahon - NH
5. pope mollusk vi -SC
6. Sykes- NJ
7. CATom - CA
8. Coffee - NY
9. Frank M- CT
10. sgl245 - MO
11. Kolak-
12.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:02 pm
by Coffeeholic
[color=red:f78f827ae7]I'll assign JKolak & Genegrid states for pick 3 #'s... if you guys have a problem with this, you can change it... but it may mean the diff. between getting the draft going tonight or not.[/color:f78f827ae7]

1. Hooner11 - PA
2. Genegrid - AZ
3. Martin (msheaf1) - TX
4. bigmahon - NH
5. pope mollusk vi -SC
6. Sykes- NJ
7. CATom - CA
8. Coffee - NY
9. Frank M- CT
10. sgl245 - MO
11. Kolak - Idaho
12.

[color=red:f78f827ae7]1 more and we can use tonights #'s... make sure to pick a west coast state though, since these haven't run yet! New Mexico and Washington both have pick 3's[/color:f78f827ae7]