by gorshar » Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:55 pm
Actually I think the point is being missed. The 3:2 ratio will work. Remember, you're not nominating a player to fill *your* roster, you're nominating a player to fill *somebody's* roster, anybody's. Even if you don't need a batter, somebody else will until the last one. When everybody has 15 batters, they simply stop nominating. When everybody has 10 pitchers, they, too, stop nominating.
So if you take Dave Chalk and it's your last hitter, you still make a nomination for the others to bid on. I think the problem is not with the numbers but with the names. As we get near the end we may have problems where nobody wants the nominated player.
For example, let's say 10 out of 12 have all their hitters and two teams still need hitters, one needs three, the other needs one. Let's say I've chosen my 15th hitter so I'm done. Duke Snider, Roger Maris, Charlie Gehringer, and Gabby Hartnett are all available. And I nominate Oris Hockett. Neither of the two want this guy. So I nominate Tom Paciorek. No takers. So I nominate Babe Dahlgren. Nobody. So I nominate Ted Sizemore...
see the problem? It could take an eternity to sort this out.
So the problem will not be the ratio of hitters to pitchers, the problem will be nominating players somebody wants. I think we have to devise a plan where once you've filled your last hitter or pitcher your nomination for that position needs to be passed on to someone who still needs a player.