General Managers Keeper League

Postby LANCEBOUSLEY » Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:19 pm

hmm....... i just went back and looked at my team.... can't say i'm going for prospects. can't say i'm "going for it either"......

i'd have to say i'm not going for the championship this year... but am trying to put a somewhat competitive team on the field while eying the future somewhat.... i believe that drafting a core of guys with proven success is the way to go about building a franchise....... especially in a league like this with multiple FA drafts and a "prospect" list.

it'll be real nice when in the future we can have guys on the 40 man who dont' have cards for the current year.

don't know if any of this makes sense but it's what happens when we stop mid draft for the weekend...... my wife often says i say too little with too many words :shock:
LANCEBOUSLEY
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby cirills » Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:22 pm

[quote:85ca637d26]don't know if any of this makes sense but it's what happens when we stop mid draft for the weekend[/quote:85ca637d26]

I mean, how hard is it (was it) to leave a list of 20 proxies.

My current one is OVER that. :? :roll: :evil: :cry:
cirills
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Cubit » Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:46 pm

I have been happy with this league's rules since the beginning; I don't think I ever saw any different from those posted at the top of the page, but I can see that Qk and others might have had earlier versions in mind. I just went with what was written at the top of the thread, and being a bear of small brain, I've been back there quite a few times already.

Since KD seems to be insisting on democracy, I am prepared to embrace the compromise decision on the second proposal; it certainly juices up those final rounds. I am glad Qksilver proposed it.

Proposal No. 1
Kaviksdad -- No
Qksilver
Sandlotshrink -- No
Smokey
Dr. Tax - No
Ninersphan
Cummings
Cubit - No
Sykes - No
Akindian - No
AFDickie
Nythawk

Proposal No. 2
Kaviksdad -- Yes
Qksilver -- Yes
Sandlotshrink -- Yes
Smokey
Dr. Tax - Yes
Ninersphan
Cummings
Cubit- Yes
Sykes - Yes
Akindian
AFDickie
Nythawk
Cubit
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby cirills » Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:12 pm

Proposal No. 1
Kaviksdad -- No
Qksilver
Sandlotshrink -- No
Smokey
Dr. Tax - No
Ninersphan
Cummings
Cubit - No
Sykes - No
Akindian - No
AFDickie
Nythawk

Proposal No. 2
Kaviksdad -- Yes
Qksilver -- Yes
Sandlotshrink -- Yes
Smokey
Dr. Tax - Yes
Ninersphan
Cummings
Cubit- Yes
Sykes - Yes
Akindian - No
AFDickie
Nythawk


I believe that Akidindian voted NO on the bottom too but it keeps getting skipped.

That said, it will take only two more Yeses to pass #2.
cirills
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby cummings2 » Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:32 pm

Okey Dokey.

Voting via mobile so its tough to copy/paste

Prop 1) No
Prop 2) Yes

I'm gathering still no movement in the draft then.

Hopefully the momentum will carry on when we resume it was going quite smoothly.

C2
cummings2
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby kaviksdad » Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:00 am

Proposal No. 1
Kaviksdad -- No
Qksilver
Sandlotshrink -- No
Smokey
Dr. Tax - No
Ninersphan
Cummings -- No
Cubit - No
Sykes - No
Akindian - No
AFDickie
Nythawk

Proposal No. 2
Kaviksdad -- Yes
Qksilver -- Yes
Sandlotshrink -- Yes
Smokey
Dr. Tax -- Yes
Ninersphan
Cummings -- Yes
Cubit -- Yes
Sykes -- Yes
Akindian -- No
AFDickie
Nythawk

Current restults:

Prop. No. 1 -- [b:d6c5c1ec87] 0 yes, 7 No[/b:d6c5c1ec87]

Prop. No. 2 -- [b:d6c5c1ec87]7 yes, 1 No[/b:d6c5c1ec87]
kaviksdad
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby nythawk129921 » Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:44 am

Proposal 1-no
proposal 2-Yes
nythawk129921
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby superflymacdaddyjuice » Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:10 am

Greetings from jackson hole wy.

NO and NO.


I am very very unhappy with this development. I have drafted my current team based on the rules that were set forth from the beginning. How can we change the rules now!?!? I brought this very issue up at around round #3 in our draft when there would have been time to change things. And the rules were clarified for everyone to see. and NOBODY said a PEEP, so the draft proceeded. now we are at round 20 and you want to change things? ridiculous. If you insist on ******* around with the rules. Set the rules in place and then re start the draft from scratch. Totally unreasonable. If I would have thought this COULD be the case I would have drafted much differently. WE ARE HALF WAY THROUGH THE FREAKING DRAFT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would really feel differently if we did not go over all of this already..

I will check back later.
superflymacdaddyjuice
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby qksilver69 » Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:39 pm

Hawk's vote makes proposal #2 pass by my count. KD will confirm.

Smokey, let's talk offline, check PM...
qksilver69
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby cirills » Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:12 pm

[quote:78dcb08f64]Welcome (YOUR NAME)
Round 21
AFDICKY has pick #251
until 2007-09-22 10:00:03 EST
[/quote:78dcb08f64]

[url]http://www.geocities.com/chp295/jeopardy.mid[/url]

Just in case you haven't seen the above like 50 million times over the past few days. :roll: :P
Last edited by cirills on Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cirills
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

cron