PACIFICA, CA A's trade 2012 3rd Rd FA pick & RP-R.Perry (Detroit Tigers) to LitAngel for SP-F.Carmona.
RP
NEW STRAT KEEPER LEAGUE
TRADE with LitAngel
by CaliENGR » Sat May 28, 2011 12:09 am
- CaliENGR
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Trade
by rzepernick » Tue May 31, 2011 10:26 pm
Grays confirm receiving Ryan Sweeney as the roster player received from the GMen along with Belt in the trade for Wainwright
- rzepernick
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by kimkrichbaum2 » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:56 am
So Billy what is the timing on the supplemental draft, and on next season?
- kimkrichbaum2
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
PROPOSAL for NEWSKL 2012
by CaliENGR » Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:16 am
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to propose that we cut the mandatory minimum of 10 roster cuts for the FA Draft (pre draft roster to 30 or less) to a mandatory minimum of 5 cuts (pre-draft roster to 35 or less). I think all of our teams are situated in such a way that 10 cuts seems way to much & that some of us would be making cuts that we might not necessarily want to make. This proposal doesn't take away the ability for someone to make 10 or more cuts if needed but it allows teams that don't have 10 cuts to worry about cutting people they may not want to cut under the current system plus we now have prospect promotions to consider which may limit a team's FA picks.
Looking for feedback on this proposal (+ & -).
thanx,
RP
PACIFICA A's
I would like to propose that we cut the mandatory minimum of 10 roster cuts for the FA Draft (pre draft roster to 30 or less) to a mandatory minimum of 5 cuts (pre-draft roster to 35 or less). I think all of our teams are situated in such a way that 10 cuts seems way to much & that some of us would be making cuts that we might not necessarily want to make. This proposal doesn't take away the ability for someone to make 10 or more cuts if needed but it allows teams that don't have 10 cuts to worry about cutting people they may not want to cut under the current system plus we now have prospect promotions to consider which may limit a team's FA picks.
Looking for feedback on this proposal (+ & -).
thanx,
RP
PACIFICA A's
- CaliENGR
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by RUSSIMLER » Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:53 am
I always assumed that the deeper cuts were designed to get some of the better players into the free agent pool to move them around, as in free agency. "Better" being a relative term of course.
I don't have much of an opinion either way right now, until I hear some more discussion. Clearly I'm not much of a general manager anyway :oops: :lol:
I don't have much of an opinion either way right now, until I hear some more discussion. Clearly I'm not much of a general manager anyway :oops: :lol:
- RUSSIMLER
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by TefJ » Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:05 pm
First off, congratulations on winning, Litangel!
I'm in favor of keeping it as is. I think 30 is a good number that allows you to keep the core of your team intact, but still ensures that there are quality players available in the FA draft. Especially since this league requires us to draft players with cards only, we have a relatively thin pool of players to choose from to begin with.
I'm in favor of keeping it as is. I think 30 is a good number that allows you to keep the core of your team intact, but still ensures that there are quality players available in the FA draft. Especially since this league requires us to draft players with cards only, we have a relatively thin pool of players to choose from to begin with.
- TefJ
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Return to Individual League Chat
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests