by MARCPELLETIER » Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:06 am
In my own experience, Hal is very reluctant to use pinch-hitters for ss-1 with rosters limited to 13 players.
Last year, I had Adam Everett (cheap hitter, ss-1) and Hal occasionally pinch-hit for him when my roster was at 14 players. But as soon as my roster would shrink due to injuries, Everett would remain in the game. Also, I had a left-fielder who could play ss (Figgins), so oftentimes, Hal would only use one player (the pinch-hitter would go to lf, and Figgins would move to ss).
Here is some games where Everett was pinch-hit:
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2005/league/boxscore.html?group_id=11446&g_id=782
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2005/league/boxscore.html?group_id=11446&g_id=809
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2005/league/boxscore.html?group_id=11446&g_id=836
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2005/league/boxscore.html?group_id=11446&g_id=842
Take note that Everett would be pinch-hit ONLY
--in the 9th inning
-- OR, if pinch-hit before the 9th inning, when a change of pitchers was done exactly before the upcoming of Everett.
Otherwise, Everett would remain in the line-up.
You might argue that Hal could use Hocking (a switch) to pinch-hit for Everett and take the field, which would also costs only one player, ut there is another problem with Hocking: he has no slugging whatsoever, and Hal loves slugging. So Hal is probably thinking that, at least in most cases, Hocking is not better than Everett.
Cal Everett is an ideal pinch-hitter, with his clutch and his slugging, but if I am right, you would need more flexibility with your roster to have him be as a pinch-hitter.