by geekor » Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:05 pm
[quote:0e31b303be="Coffeeholic"]Btw, why the love for Olivio?
Kendall seems to make so much more sense?[/quote:0e31b303be]
Olivo has more tb's, slugging, *B rated stealer, great clutch. His only drawback is horrible def, in a platoon he still gets anywhere from 11-20 errors :(
[quote:0e31b303be]Vs R.
not enough OBP leading off, not enough SLG/Avg. in the 2 hole, Neg clutch on 4 (can't remember Mauer's -maybe I'm wrong) and 5. DPs in the middle right behind the highest OBPer, not enough SLG in the 7th and so-so OBP to turn the order.
Personally I don't think of Figgins as a leader offer.
I'd suggest replacing Roberts with Castillo, Rollins with Furcal, Pods with Holliday, Taveras with Duffy. Should be similar in prices, injury risks go up but there are plenty cheapies to patch with.
Just my .02 though.[/quote:0e31b303be]
I don't get the love affair with Furcal. I have never seen him post any numbers worth anything.
Yes, Figgins doesn't have the prtotypical leadoff OBP. But he does have awesome speed. for instance, I almost always bat Duffy 2nd because of the low dp's. He has enver scored more than 85 runs for me, beacuse he is so damn slow. Don't get me wrong, no one used Pratt more than me in the 03 game, for the same reasons I like Duffy. Speed will net you a few extra runs, and also lowers the DP chances.
________________________________________
forget a moment about the exact players. In this set I noticed (well someone else pointed out, I think it was you Cummings) that DP's were up across the board this year. You look, it's true, no hiding it. So I made this team to see the vlaue of DP's.
http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2006/team/team_other.html?user_id=6266
a team that lost in the finals, but still even with the low ba (bottome 1.4 of the league) and low obp (6th) I wasn't giving away free outs.
the thing with the speed, is it counters a lot of the DP problems. Also, because this season had so many 1 sided cards, I started long ago no worrying about platoons, but having 3 who ar egood vs both sides, and 3 that are good vs 1, and 3 good vs the other. Basic principle, no reason to worry about the 7th, 8th and 9th as much, as long as the top of the order is doing well.