Page 1 of 1
gbA+?
Posted:
Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:33 am
by iarzwashere
is this the same as gba? will this induce a double play ?
Posted:
Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:53 am
by AeroDave10
When there is a runner on first, if the defense chooses to hold the runner at first, gbA+ turns into a single. If the defense does not hold the runner at first, yes, gbA is a double play ball.
Posted:
Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:19 am
by durantjerry
Based on a post I read years ago, this is incorrect. The post said GBA+ did not apply in the super advances game and was therefore always just a GBA in SOMO.
Posted:
Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:12 pm
by MARCPELLETIER
Actually, gbA+(xx) becomes single** if the fielder xx plays in (e.g. ss when infield plays in).
When the runner is held, another sort of penalty kicks in. For a runner being held at first, with a lefty at-bat, 1b and ss loses 1 of range, and moreover 20% of balls hit at their directions will become single** instead of outs.
Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2010 1:11 am
by joethejet
Almost right. Actually ++ is only a Si** when the infield is all the way in. Not corners in.
SUPER ADVANCED
17.12 Convert the "gb()+" to a SINGLE** ONLY when the infield is all the way in.
Jet
www.angelfire.com/games5/joethejet
Confused, again......
Posted:
Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:24 pm
by centerfielder17
So, does it make sense to have a player with a gb++ hitting behind a runner likely to be held, or in the super advanced game that we are playing does it matter at all?
Posted:
Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:51 am
by PotKettleBlack
Simple way to figure it... I count them as .5 of a GBA. I'm sure someone could do better, but this is quick and dirty.
Posted:
Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:24 pm
by joethejet
Well, since holding doesn't matter at all, then your gb++ won't matter at all behind a base stealer. It only applies to infield all the way in.
In addition, I think most players have a ++ on their card unless they're a total K machine..
Jet
www.angelfire.com/games5/joethejet