Page 1 of 1

defensive replacements

PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:41 am
by rgimbel
does it make sense to replace sheffield 4(-2) e4 with Davonan 3(0) e4

PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:13 am
by pedakrla
Absolutely. That extra range is worth more runs (saved) than the stronger arm.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:58 am
by markp65
Respectfully disagree with Dave here. For the amount of chances you see at the corner OF spots, I'd concede a few hits over the long haul to have a couple of guns out there to neutralize the other team's running game. If you can stick at least two guys with (-2) or better arms in your OF, one of two good things will happen: the other managers won't attempt to take the extra base on you or... they will :wink:

Like to hear other opinions on this one.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 11:33 am
by rgimbel
[quote:b676bc799a="markp65"]Respectfully disagree with Dave here. For the amount of chances you see at the corner OF spots, I'd concede a few hits over the long haul to have a couple of guns out there to neutralize the other team's running game. If you can stick at least two guys with (-2) or better arms in your OF, one of two good things will happen: the other managers won't attempt to take the extra base on you or... they will :wink:

Like to hear other opinions on this one.[/quote:b676bc799a]

the other elements are these I have damon terrible arm in cf and ramirez also a -2 in right and the other factor is the hitting if I fall behind in the game I lose sheffields bat

PostPosted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:17 pm
by pedakrla
Don't forget, when those corner outfielders don't make the play, it turns into a double or triple. While the defensive chances are few, the total bases add up.

I've done some rough calculations, and I estimate a 4 in RF or LF vs. a 3 costs you just as many runs as a 4 vs. 3 at SS. :shock:

It's all in the total bases, and assuming an approximate OBP of .333. Use the thumbrule runs = total bases x OBP.......

PostPosted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:09 pm
by rgimbel
but you are not including the extra outs like dp and getting the lead runner that a better ss gives u

PostPosted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 7:22 pm
by pedakrla
True. That swings the pendulum toward the SS's fielding rating being more important than a corner outfielder. But we're still talking about the same order of magnitude. I believe a 4 in LF/RF will hurt you almost as much as a 4 at SS.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:39 pm
by Proverbial Psalms
I think there's nothing worse than a 4 at SS.. ok, maybe a +4 catcher... nut a 4 in LF is ok in my book, if the e rating is no higher than a 6... a 4e4 who has lots of power doesn't hurt much, IMO, unless you have holes in one or too other key defense positions.