by J-Pav » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:02 pm
[b:c585a266eb]Big:[/b:c585a266eb]
Thanks for jumping into the mix!
A little clarification on pitching...
Points 4 and 5 are actually 3A and 3B. Regarding Point 3, getting the most value out of your pitching, what I was trying to say is this:
Wins and losses are determined by the pythagorean projection (that I think Bill James first discussed), and which can be calculated at a site like Diamonddope.com. The long and short of it is [i:c585a266eb]net[/i:c585a266eb] runs wins games.
Since your offense isn't gonna average 8 runs per game while your defense yields 2, you need to find the most realistic balance to keep them apart. In a pitchers park, a $30 million pitching staff can easily go around 4.00 runs allowed. But your offense suffers some of the consequences. The $50 million in salary in a pitchers park might only get you say 4.5 runs per game. That will get you 90 [i:c585a266eb]forecasted[/i:c585a266eb] wins, but it's easier said than done. HAL often cheats managers out of their pythagorean entitlement by sucking away some wins.
So the value part of the equation considers your park, your division foes parks and the league balance as well. In my opinion, the best way to increase your pythagorean spread is the unbalanced park (Shea & Minute Maid, plus a few others), but I don't think this will come as a revelation to anybody. You can also do it by building a better mousetrap, ie yours is the best designed Coors team in a division with four Coors (or other hitters parks).
Depending on the make-up of the league, getting the most value out of your $30-32 million in pitching is too relative to be specific. You can have a 4.50 ERA, in US Cellular, and still be third in runs allowed in your league. In a pitchers park dominated league, 4.50 might find you in 9th. The choice of the word [i:c585a266eb]value[/i:c585a266eb] is to say "finish high in pitching (runs allowed)" however you have to do it, within the context of your strategy, given the set of circumstances that define your league.
After saying all that, though, my out of sample list shows the offense now catching up to the pitching. So I guess the word [i:c585a266eb]"balance"[/i:c585a266eb] best sums things up now. Generally I've always found that if I'm top 6 in runs scored and top 6 in runs allowed, my team is "in the hunt."
3A and 3B is breaking down "runs allowed." Low WHIP, low ERA. My argument is that this year, low HIP matters more (to me, anyway). Lilly, Leiter, Oliver Perez...guys like this. So I try to squeeze blood from the pitching stone by giving up as few hits as I can while conceding more walks to do so (you can't have it all). My solid defense creates more double-plays than average, so I don't mind giving up first base more if it means less guys visiting the other bases.
I hope that explains things better.
And thanks again for jumping in. I was hoping to create a discussion, not deliver a monologue, so we could all learn more from each other.
P.S. The [i:c585a266eb][b:c585a266eb]Pain Train[/b:c585a266eb][/i:c585a266eb] has left Port Huron, en route Chicago. Maybe this team is finding itself after tripping out of the gate!
8)