by honestiago1 » Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:17 pm
Had some great years from Murph, including my only championship with him in CF, producing 100 RBI. Butler's has some low averages, but he's good for 80+ runs scored, and will usually get over 90.
To answer what I perceive to be queries, below:
This team above was unusual. I had quite a few middle-priced players, and tinkered a lot with lineups. They had a low OBP, over 70 errors from the SS, 3B and 2B positions, and no standout pitchers. It isn't indicative of what I'd consider a typically successful team (it scored exactly as many runs as it gave up). That's why I like it so much. I guess the only thing I can say it had was depth. Lansford was basically a backup and DH versus LH's, for example. Braggs gave me AB's at DH and in RF vs. LH's. Martinez led off a lot for me, though his OBP was under .300 (awful!). I set my own lineups, which is how Fletcher, Lansford, Braggs, Paciorek, etc. all played. I did bench some players sometimes (Jones ended up riding the pine a lot later on), and endured a long injury stint from Cey. Evans was platooned with Lansford. Fletcher played a lot of DH (I never COULD find a decent leadoff man -- I think Lansford may have been the best choice). Moseby's injury forced me to play Martinez in CF, Evans at DH, and Carney at 1B. Lots of jimmying, and, quite frankly, the team overperformed much of the year, and got a bit lucky at the end.
Anyway, as far as bullpens go, I like to spend some money. A good bullpen can bail out a typical staff. The 1-2M relievers have some bargains among them. Lopez, who goes for .80, is, to me, the best sub-1M gamble. You can use his "bad cards" (severely skewed reverse card, and a righty-killer). Still, I usually have an expensive bullpen stud somewhere to close things out (Henke, if I can get him). I think it's well worth it to have someone to close things out, and I'd prefer someone who can get me K's. K's kill rallies (which is why I've become a Ryan-Sid convert). I think this team had an excellent 4-man staff, but I never could find that 5th starter. If I'd had Ojeda, it would've been a fantastic rotation. He doesn't have an awful card, and I love having him as part of a 5-man. Ryan IS expensive, but he's very hard to hit. Sid is even harder. I like to keep hits down, and am willing to give up some walks.
Stadiums: I'm often an Astrodome guy (btw, the Tiger Stadium team, above, started as a slow, slugging team. The team doesn't fit the stadium, really, which explains the poor home record.) I don't care for extreme hitter's parks, though I've played in them. I've chosen exhibition stadium twice now. You can build almost any kind of team there. As far as hitters, I like to find batters who thrived in pitcher's parks. Since most of these online leagues are hitters leagues, these guys can only improve (the league I just got in this week has a pair of Kingdomes in my division, and a pair of Riverfronts [among other hitter's paradises]).
I think pitching wins in the playoffs, though mashing HR's will often get you there. I also think a lot of managers overlook foot speed when drafting a team (and I mean running rating, rather than steal rating). A player who isn't hitting well can still produce if he can run. Dude gets on with, say, a fielder's choice and is a 1-16 runner, he's a threat to come in on a double. Get a team of 7-8 speedsters and they can always mount a threat, since ethey can scoot around.