Strat-O-Matic Baseball 1969
29 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
by FRANKMANSUETO » Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:15 pm
And yes it will definitely be cool to use the players we grew up w/. Visick don't U say anything. :P
- FRANKMANSUETO
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by MICHAELTARBELL » Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:33 pm
[quote:a905bb6037]Mike, U were 45 in '69 weren't U? [/quote:a905bb6037]
No Frank, but i have 69'd a 45 before.... :wink: :wink:
No Frank, but i have 69'd a 45 before.... :wink: :wink:
- MICHAELTARBELL
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
it is what it is
by MtheB » Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:42 pm
don't get this where owners want each different game to be the same as the others.
love the new paradigms of 69, super-starters, big gaps at SS,2B, 3B and Catcher--its just a different set of variables.
thank god for plurality.
Play ball!!!!!
love the new paradigms of 69, super-starters, big gaps at SS,2B, 3B and Catcher--its just a different set of variables.
thank god for plurality.
Play ball!!!!!
- MtheB
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by childsmwc » Thu Sep 22, 2005 7:43 pm
Coffeeholic,
I think the changes in roster size shows that TSN does listen to our feedback and makes changes when they can. The ATG community has been upset ever since ATGII came out and it required the 10 man staff similar to the 200X game. The community has long argued that a 10 man rotation does not make sense in the context of a rotation with 300+ inning starters.
It looks like they have reviewed this for 1969 and made changes in the roster requirements accordingly. As far as the 24 man roster is concerned, I have always felt it was rediculous not to require 25 man rosters like the majors. From a competitive advantage standpoint, the community will generally drop their roster to the minimum allowed, so again another positive change to force more realistic looking rosters. Maybe with the release of their next project 25 man rosters will be required.
Bbrool
I think the changes in roster size shows that TSN does listen to our feedback and makes changes when they can. The ATG community has been upset ever since ATGII came out and it required the 10 man staff similar to the 200X game. The community has long argued that a 10 man rotation does not make sense in the context of a rotation with 300+ inning starters.
It looks like they have reviewed this for 1969 and made changes in the roster requirements accordingly. As far as the 24 man roster is concerned, I have always felt it was rediculous not to require 25 man rosters like the majors. From a competitive advantage standpoint, the community will generally drop their roster to the minimum allowed, so again another positive change to force more realistic looking rosters. Maybe with the release of their next project 25 man rosters will be required.
Bbrool
- childsmwc
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by Valen » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:20 pm
[quote:c57be6b75a]Why not turn off the injuries on a player when he's missed as many games as he did during the season?[/quote:c57be6b75a]
Curious, would you also be in favor if a guy had not missed as many games as he did during the real life season if he were forced injured an appropriate number of games at the end of the season.
Curious, would you also be in favor if a guy had not missed as many games as he did during the real life season if he were forced injured an appropriate number of games at the end of the season.
- Valen
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by Jservi » Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:53 pm
What about realism...
Billy Williams, Ernie Banks, Ron Santo, Hundley....
I am in a league where Ernie Banks is a free agent. Does that seem realistic?
I am not a huge strat person, dont know the ins and outs like some, but like playing because of the names and "owning" some of my favorite players. It is a sad day that I dont feel like Ernie Banks is good enough to pickup
Billy Williams, Ernie Banks, Ron Santo, Hundley....
I am in a league where Ernie Banks is a free agent. Does that seem realistic?
I am not a huge strat person, dont know the ins and outs like some, but like playing because of the names and "owning" some of my favorite players. It is a sad day that I dont feel like Ernie Banks is good enough to pickup
- Jservi
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
29 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: 1969, 1986, 1999
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests