[b:13c73a78c0]lucky[/b:13c73a78c0], you had a few observations that are correct, but most i dont agree with.
first off halladay is priced right. he is equal to clemens w/out a star (he is better than clemens in a pitchers park, about equal but maybe a little worse in a hitters park). harden is much worse than both of them (like .4 worse ERA in a hitters park and like .9 in a pitchers park), plus add in the s6 versus s7. that is why he is priced less than them. in terms of king, i agree with you. he is worse than both halladay and clemens, a little better than harden.
pitching numbers dont tell much since its hard to calculate ERA off them, but here's what i have:
(pitcher_name, obp_points_v_left, slg_pts_v_left, obp_pts_v_right, slg_pts_v_right)
clemens: 12, 8 16, 11
halladay: 10, 10 13, 22
king: 14, 7 18, 17
harden: 19, 6 18, 17
like i said, they dont tell me that much just looking at them. i mean it looks to me that they justify my claims, but maybe that is just because i want them to. either way, from what i have simulated and what i have calculated, it puts clemens and halladay as relative ERA-wise, with king next (but still .2 to .3 worse), followed by harden (with the ERA differences i pointed out above). add in the s6, and i think harden is priced right.
one more point. even if you think clemens is overpriced, when you get clemens, and you get a pitcher who is the best pitcher in the set, you know that every time he pitches, he has the best chance of winning. every time he goes up against another big * sp, he has the best chance of winning. to me, that adds about .5 or so million dollars to his value. thats just me.