2 team theme league

Our historical single season sets

Great Format

Postby centerfielder17 » Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:12 pm

When picking early, it was tough to decide how to risk the balance of the first round playing out. Bal and Min went early, and if there was a run on the better teams in the first round, the pickings could have been slim, even if you had a high second round pick.

As it turned out, after my 4th pick, everyone went low to position themselves for round 2. That meant it was 17 picks in between my 'middle' top tier team, Cinci, and my second pick.

When I picked Cinci, I felt the worst case scenario was I'd get either Sea or Cle in round 2. Cle went the pick before mine and Sea dropped to me.

The strategy was great, and I can't see it playing out the same way twice.

The other graet thing about this format may be the way it encourages trading to fill holes that a normal franchise would have. much better than having a FA pool for everone to fight over. We'll see.

I'd do this again in a heartbeat, but I might want a lower 1st round pick to see how things are breaking! :)
centerfielder17
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Cubs48 » Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:42 pm

...if only I could 've gotten the Cubs in the 1st round...instead I end up with the White Sox,thanks to Minnie Minoso no less... :wink: :)
Cubs48
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby minnie minoso » Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:25 pm

I was afraid the Cubs pick was going to make you tense, Cubs48, lol. They just seemed like a good cheap team with lots of positions covered, and a couple of pretty good starters. I was also figuring that I would have a good shot at getting a top flight SP, and a good CF and RF with several different teams in the second round. Lucky for me it worked out.

My team is ready, but I'm debating between Wrigley and Candlestick. When should we put the teams in? Is there a deadline, other than Friday?

By the way, I've got a couple of cheap starters, Holtzman and Selma, and Beckert, Hickman, and Dietz (C) available for a RP in the $2-4 MM range. Also have a lot of .50-1.00 guys if anybody drafted some teams that are short on them....
minnie minoso
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Cubs48 » Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:45 pm

..the Central is full...only the West to go ! :)

MinnieMinoso....check your privates...please ! :)
Cubs48
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby keyzick » Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:04 pm

I'm open for trades, but I gotta admit I'm pretty happy with the way my team turned out.
keyzick
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby franky35 » Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:46 pm

Please try and sign up today. We only need two more and the league drafts tonight. I'd like to get to trading.

Except for pitching, my team is pretty bad. I need a RF or DH that can hit righties. A 3b that can hit lefties would also be nice. My decent players available for trade include Wes Parker, Munson, Ellis, Sutton, etc. I'm open to trading starters too.
franky35
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby centerfielder17 » Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:06 pm

Available for trade:
Maloney, Jim
R 2.77 1.24 1R 6.11M
Nolan, Gary
R 3.56 1.31 3L 2.80M
Merritt, Jim
L 1.31 6L 2.23M
Granger, Wayne
R 2.80 1.26 3R 1.25M
Carroll, Clay
R 3.52 1.51 1R .91M
Corrales, Pat
R C 2(-1)e9 .264 .346 .375 .72 3.11M
Savage, Ted
R LF 3(0)e7 .227 .344 .345 .689 2.31M
Meyer, Bob
L 3.31 1.22 8L 4.26M
Gelnar, John
R 3.31 1.19 5R 4.11M
Brabender, Gene
R 4.36 1.46 1R 1.74M
Brunet, George
L 4.44 1.43 3R 1.56M
Locker, Bob
R 3.14 1.27 E 2.16M
Segui, Diego
R 3.35 1.32 E 1.88M
O'Donoghue, John E.
L 2.96 1.36 1R 1.30M
Bouton, Jim
R 3.91 1.25 5L .85M
Mincher, Don
L 1B 4e8 .246 .366 .454 .820 3.32M
Harper, Tommy
R 3B 4e24 .235 .349 .311 .660 1.94M
Stanley, Fred
R SS 4e25 .279 .319 .372 .691 2.22M
Kennedy, John
R SS 4e68 .234 .315 .367 .682 2.05M
Oyler, Ray
R SS 2e27 165 .260 .267 .527 .60M
Hegan, Mike
L LF 4(+1)e16 .292 .427 .461 .888 7.94M
Whitaker, Steve
L LF 3(+1)e13 .250 .323 .440 .763 1.06m
Davis, Tommy
R LF 4(+4)e11 454271 .318 .379 .697 .60M
Comer, Wayne
R CF 4(-1)e8 .245 .354 .380 .734 3.23M
Hovley, Steve
L RF 3(-1)e4 .277 .338 .365 .703 2.21M


I'm looking for any pitching and a SS.

First come, first serve. No reasonable deal refused! :wink:
centerfielder17
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby CATom » Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:41 pm

ONLY 1 2 go :).
CATom
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

minnesota filled so many spots

Postby dlarkins » Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:31 pm

I went with minny and their power oark

killibrew never gettin ghurt and putting him a tfirst base
also oliva not bad and cardenas carew decent hitters at second and short
i was hopinfg cleveland would slip by but it went befoer eme.

very interesting draft concepot it was fun

dan
dlarkins
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

WASHINGTON AS THE 2ND PICK

Postby rschwartz51 » Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:24 pm

I saw comment about the Washington Senators. I had experience playing a few COMBO THEMES with the 1969 set though it was a while back. One that was just like this I was the commissioner of and with Boston and Washington I won a Championship. Playing in Fenway I won and F. Howard hit 60 HRS.

I decided to try picking Washington first and then I would have an early 2nd round pick. I did misjudge how many teams under Washington would be picked in the 1st round but I did correctly predict what my worst case scenario would be. I thought one of either Bost, SF, Atl or the Mets would be left. The mets probably the last one I wanted but I'm happy though it made me change to a more pitching ballpark.

I did enjoy getting many well thought out trade offers and though I went with one eliminating 2-3 possible offers they still were good offers.

The deal I ended with was Tom Seaver, G. Gentry, B. Harrelson and A. Shamsky for M. Stottlemeyer, D. Sutton and H. Clarke. I may have done better if I split them up but I had seen Stottlemeyer do quite well in Shea Stadium compared to Seaver and Sutton being a bit strong vs Righties is a better fit than Gentry who is a 5L. Harrelson was a sub and H. Clarke improved my INF defense quite a bit. Shamsky just didn't fit though a good hitter.
rschwartz51
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Previous

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: 1969, 1986, 1999

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron