by PJ Axelsson » Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:44 pm
I think it's been shown that it is easier to win in pitcher's parks or neutral parks than in hitters parks. The exception in my experience has been the parks with high homers but very low singles. Those seem to be successful as well.
The old standby forumla for winning, created by Dobak, the Yoda of ATG jedi, was to have one ace in the 10m range, 2 starters in the 7-5m range, and a 4th starter that fit the park and division, or rounded out the biases of the first three.
The bullpen still mystifies me, and seems to succeed more in response to the balance of the league and division than as a result of it's makeup. If your team wins easier, your pen looks better. If not, it doesn't matter who is in there, they'll look bad.
The old standard of defense (up the middle in particular) and as much of it spread about elsewhere is still valid. Odd, that this game, based entirely on numbers and percentages, is one place where defense is valued most. It would seem in real baseball, it becomes less and less important.
I think that the offense you build can vary greatly, and I tend to focus more on the defense and pitching first, and then worry about scoring later.
That's a rough start, and I'm not sure if I answered your question, but I enjoyed the ramble.