I am in a really fun interactive league in 2005 and early in the season my friend sends out an e-mail that says:
To: All
From: ************
Subject: Stat of the Week
Date: Saturday 11/26/2005 09:47 AM
Brad Wilkerson
Real 2004 season: 160 games, 67 RBIs
Our league: 36 games, 54 RBIs
A few hours later one of the managers replies
To: All
From: ****************
Subject: Re: Stat of the Week
Date: Saturday 11/26/2005 01:17 PM
How about if we restrict league e-mail to really
pertinent issues?
If you want to send to everyone else that's fine
but instead of sending to "all teams in the
league" please send to everyone else except me. I
have a lot of teams and don't have time to look at
extraneous e-mails every day.
Thanks for your understanding.
So we do cut back a little bit but apparently not enough because he is set off by a harmless e-mail from another manager:
To: All
From: *******
Subject: Re: Re: Meet the Mets?
Date: Wednesday 11/30/2005 01:35 PM
My theory--Much easier being a big fish in a small pond, than being a big
fish in a big pond! For every Jeter there are a hundred Beltrans, Bobby B,
Pavano,Johnson, Brown's Etc> Most cannot stand up to the pressure that
the NY/LA media puts on them, Jeter is truly one of a kind!
This produces an extremely nasty and disturbing response from the "anti spam" manager:
To: ************
From: ***********
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Meet the Mets?
Date: Wednesday 11/30/2005 02:08 PM
Apparantly you guys can't read.
NO SPAM
STOP sending me crap, if you have something
important to say TO ME then feel free to send.
STOP.
Otherwise I'll start sending you a bunch of
messages you don't care anything about and see how
you like it.
Seriously.
*******************************************
He then spammed one of the managers with 45 e-mails.
My question is two fold:
Has this every happened to anyone in another league?
What is the definition of pertinent in stratomatic? My assumption was that anything baseball related was fair game?