American & National League 2 Team Combo 2nd League

Our historical single season sets

Postby lumbercompanysouth » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:01 pm

I'd be willing to give that a try after the 1-1

Lumber
lumbercompanysouth
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby rschwartz51 » Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm

My earlier concept didn't get the necessary support to eliminate the original concept so lets go back and have a vote:

1)

a) 1 TEAM FROM BOTH AL/NL
b) 2 Teams From Same League
c) 2 Teams From Either League

2)

a) $80M
B) $100M

3) I'm pushing No DH

4) I'm pushing 20 mandatory players per combo.


Please vote on items 1 & 2
rschwartz51
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby the splinter » Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:11 pm

I'm a

1-a
2-b
3- DH
4- straight full roster from 2 teams

But thats just me eh.
the splinter
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Clarification on My Optional Concept

Postby rschwartz51 » Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:17 pm

Under ATG2 I put together 12 combinations of team combining teams that related to each other and then after lottery was run we had a draft of those 12 combo teams.


Examples were Phil A's and Oak A's, NY & SF Gts, Phil Phillies & Pitts Pirates, NY Yankees, Bkln & LA Dodgers. For teams with fewer than 3 teams I combined using some other relationship.

For the 1969 game I would combine primarily on state location or some other basis with the idea being to balance each team.

Though I personally like the combo theme it is obvious that some managers have such a distinct advantage based on where they pick that it may discourage participation.

One possible option is to have a 12 round tournament with each manager using a different combo and the goal is to measure the total wins. The problem is that some managers always bail out.
rschwartz51
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby SEANCALHOON » Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:25 pm

1- A/B
2- A
3- No DH
4- straight full roster from 2 teams, with trades
SEANCALHOON
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby genevajack » Sat Dec 10, 2005 5:30 am

1. Bobschwartz22
2. LMBombers - DC
3. Sneezedoc-NY
4. Memphisjohn - TN
5. Splinter - GA(AL/NL only)
6. Genegrid- IN
7. Hooner - PA
8. Lumbercompanysouth -TX
9. FAaron - NJ
10. genevajack- IL
11.
12.

1. A
2. $100 million draft/$80 Roster-allows for movement to "minor leagues"
3. No DH
4. Free trades/franchise players remain the property of the team in the minor leagues
genevajack
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby genegrid » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:17 am

I'm a

1-a
2-b
3- DH
4- straight full roster from 2 teams


I'm in no matter what you come up with but I will be traveling Sun-Tuesday and will have limited accesshere.
genegrid
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Minor leagues-You will like it

Postby genevajack » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:07 am

In the 2005 version of the two team franchise league- a player is the property of the team that he is on-regardless of whether he is on the active roster. This is an interesting concept. But to fully utilize this feature-we would need a higher cap to allow movement back and forth between the big league team and the minors. Perhaps a $100 cap/$80 million roster could be used?
genevajack
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Minor leagues-Encourages Trading

Postby genevajack » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:09 am

It also encourages trading like crazy. The 2005 version has already had at least a DOZEN trades (check the thread). If you have two main players who play the same position-you don't want the guy to sit-rather you want to trade to shore up roster holes.
genevajack
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby FAaron » Sat Dec 10, 2005 5:22 pm

1-c
2-b
3-DH
4-straight full roster from 2 teams with trades and minors
FAaron
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: 1969, 1986, 1999

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron