by CHARLESBELL » Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:17 am
Bonds was never going to be popular outside his home town fans, no matter how good he was or how clean he was. Even the pre-steriods era Bonds was hated by enough of the Hall voting press to cloud his possible entry to the HOF. Whether he cares about any of that I don't know. He speaks his mind and pulls no punches, or he doesn't speak at all. A class act only if your heroes are George Steinbrenner or Donald Trump.
I have been on the fence about Bonds, but finally decided where I fall on this one. The issues:
1) Bonds is hated by a lot of the press and fans. Hated is a harsh word, but in his case it fits. He largely deserves it. Being hated doesn't change what you accomplish on the field. There are great ball players in the HOF who were not very good human beings. Few fans would want to invalidate all of their records.
2) Did Bonds use performance enhancing drugs? Not proven, but the evidence that he did is pretty convincing. My personal opinion is that he did.
2a) Were the drugs he used against baseball rules at the time he used them? The evidence here is not so overwhelming. We can frown on players who used them, and they can try to hide the fact that they did because they know it isn't considered "fair", but was against the rules at the time? Best I can determine is that they were not. At worst I believe that it will be impossible to determine one way or the other. While I may not like what Bonds and other players did, I can't see that he actually violated any baseball rules.
2b) Were the drugs he used illegal or illegally obtained? Don't know for sure, but even if they were, now you are talking about a legal issue, subject to fines and suspensions and legal action, not baseball performance on the field. I can't recall a single baseball player that has ever had his records tainted or challenged due only to illegal or even criminal behavior. Pete Rose does not have an asterisk after his career hits title.
2c) Even if Bonds didn't actually break baseball rules, didn't he bend the heck out of them? My opinion is yes he did. Ballplayers will take every edge they can get, and will bend rules when they can. However, there are no close comparisons of this scope to use here that apply. The closest I can think of is Gaylord Perry's use of the spitball, which was truly against the rules. He was caught and punished several times, and admired by most for all the times he got away with it. Perry is in the HOF and his statistics have not been challenged.
3) But this is different, isn't it? It's the all time homerun title! Certainly it's different, from an emotional perspective. We want a hero to hold that honor. We want someone universally admired, beyond reproach, or even a likable rogue. Certainly it's different, he enhanced his performance by taking drugs. But players have always done that using legal and unrestricted substances, from caffeine and vitamins on up, to illegal substances such as greenies. Did Babe Ruth use such legal and illegal means? Is there an asterisk by his record?
4) Did Bonds "cheat"? That's a subjective assessment we'll all have to make individually. I'm not going to condemn his career because he is not a likable person. I'm not going to condemn his career because he bent the rules without enough evidence that he actually broke any, and I'm not condemning his record because he wasn't a hero enough to take the high road.
I don't respect Barry Bonds. I wanted him to be a better person.
But when he breaks the record I'll acknowledge his right to the title of all time homerun leader.