by Mean Dean » Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:41 pm
That's strange logic IMO. Hitting 1st instead of 9th (I dunno whose DH hits 9th, but let's just grant it) is a difference of maybe 100 or so plate appearances over a 162-game season. The chance per PA that the pitcher will get injured is 1 in 216. So if your DH hits leadoff, you'll injure about .5 more pitchers per year than if he hit 9th; is that really significant? Surely it's more important to put together the lineup that makes the most sense under normal situations. As it turns out, Pierre most likely should hit leadoff anyway because of the nature of his card, so in that sense you're doing the right thing, but it doesn't seem like the right reason to me.
As for Pierre's value, I've had fun seasons with him drafting teams against the computer in the CD-ROM game (.325 with 87 steals in Petco was a good one, though honestly I expected more steals!) I was able to play him in LF there, though. Still, even in CF, he's valuable. It's nice that he can't get hurt and hits lefties well; you literally never have to take him out of a game. I find it hard to play him at DH in a league like this when he's "weak" both ways; there are so many DH options with power. If I had him here, I would play him in CF. I agree that the arm is not a huge thing; it's a disadvantage, but not a dealbreaker.