1969 LIVE DRAFT 80 MIL DH - LEAGUE CHAT

Our historical single season sets

Postby toshiro » Sat Dec 29, 2007 9:59 pm

No rush, PM. I'm actually enjoying this slow, holiday-like pacing of the draft. My first 69 live draft, so I'm just taking it all in.
toshiro
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Bando

Postby JOHNEIGENAUER » Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:11 am

Bob

I figured you would see my pick coming all the way from South America! I actually have Internet now and I am eager to see who you choose. I have my suspicions, but I am going to keep them to myself for a while. I´ll let you know if I am right!

Meanwhile, Happy New Year to everyone!

John E.
JOHNEIGENAUER
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ggrover15 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:09 pm

first round is in the books..... And not on pitcher was taken.... wow...
ggrover15
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Re: 1969 LIVE DRAFT 80 MIL DH - NOW DRAFTING!

Postby kenhutchings » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:36 pm

[quote:3dda3529ad="John Law"]1969 LIVE DRAFT 80 MIL DH LEAGUE

-$80 MIL salary cap
-Designated Hitter
-Live 16 round serpentine draft on draft site www.somdraft.com
-Draft order determined by state lotto pick 3; high to low
-Must pick unique stadium in any round
-Divisions 1/4/7/10 - 2/5/8/11 - 3/6/9/12 per draft order
-Waivers
-Must carry 25 man roster (no more, no less)

[/quote:3dda3529ad]

I realize that we are going to need 25 players for the initial draft, but how about if we reduce the requirement for the roster size from 25 to 24? Since we're utilizing the DH, it doesn't seem like we need to carry as many pitchers on our rosters, and it sure would be nice to have a little more cash to improve the offensive performance.

:?: :?:
kenhutchings
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ggrover15 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:52 pm

I also think it would be a good idea to allow teams to carry 24 players...
ggrover15
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby pkwmati » Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:31 pm

I would prefer to stick with the original rules and the rigid 25-man roster.

By the way, I want to give a props to Toshiro who just whipped me in the World Series in a '69 league that just completed. I had a roster of Killebrew, Petrocelli, Howard, McClain, Jenkins, Carty, Willie Davis, Brooks... easily the best Auto-draft I ever had. I can't believe that team didn't finish

Oh well, I guess I'll keep fighting for ring #1 in '69.
pkwmati
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby centerfielder17 » Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:37 am

Since we have a DH, I can't see any reason to carry 4-7 bench players either.

24 is plenty IMO, but whatever John wants. He's the boss!
centerfielder17
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby toshiro » Tue Jan 01, 2008 2:27 am

Thanks for the props, PM. I had a great draft as well. But my I had a secret weapon -- I was the WC winner.

I think things are gonna pretty interesting in this time around-- no auto draft surprises.
toshiro
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

24 players

Postby JOHNEIGENAUER » Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:37 am

While I also favor the flexibility of 24 players, other suggestions for changes have been rejected on the grounds that any changes violated original rules and therefore could not be considered. So do we consider changes by vote or reject them on the grounds that we must stay with original rules?
JOHNEIGENAUER
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby johnlaw1564 » Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:11 pm

24 or 25 man roster is ok with me, but no more than 25.
johnlaw1564
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: 1969, 1986, 1999

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron