by durantjerry » Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:54 am
I really don't see a problem with the records being inflated. They are all inflated towards guys who play more anyway, whether you pay or play for free. If it was going to screw up some high-tech weighted average ranking system, I would agree, but that's not the case. It may slightly skew a system already acknowledged to be skewed and imperfect. It doesn't bother me that someone may be ahead of me because they played more for free, just as it does not bother me that someone is ahead of me because they have paid for more teams than me(which is unlikely). However, I would like to at least see rankings for each individual game at some point, whether I paid to play or played for free, because like many, I still treated it as if I was paying.