by childsmwc » Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:39 pm
The perceived value in Willits is that the entire salary that you are paying for is OBP and speed. He has no power and is an average fielder, so basically his entire price tag is maximized for lead off hitter skills. Further he is a bit of an injury risk which reduces his price.
Now I used the term percieved because this arguement basically assumes that he is never relied on for the other half of the runs created equation, which is moving runners on base (the first being getting on base). True your 7 through 9 hitthers aren't studs, but they are still going to be on base at probably a .320 to .330 clip, so in those situations Willits is adding no additional value in moving those runners along, thus his price stays where it is.
Whats interesting is that basically the lineup maximization arguement that is being used for Willits value, is the same arguement that is basically used to suggest a player like Todd Helton is overpriced. Helton has decent OBP but not the speed you want in a lead off hitter, and he has decent Slg but not the pure power you want in your 3 through 5 hitters, but the combination of both gives him a very high price tag, yet he doesn't fit neatly into the line up because it is perceived that you are paying for say walks in an RBI roll that you would prefer not to (ie. I can buy R. Howard, or P. Fielder for less to drive in runs).
Based on my experience over the years playing with some very nontraditional lineups, I think lineup maximization is way overrated and thus I think you are getting what you pay for in Willits a weak hitting average defender with an injury risk, that should get on base at about a .380 clip and steal a few bases.
Bbrool