by J-Pav » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:27 am
Ortiz doesn't kill you because of the 5, he kills you because of the errors. Same w/ Braun. And while Ortiz will cost your team 25 runs defensively, Braun would cost you about 40. Short of playing D'Angelo Jimenez at SS, you can't do much worse than this.
I'm platooning Thome at 1B on one team and have noticed no problems at all. But Thome only has seven errors: a 5e7 is roughly equal to a 3e19 or a 4e11 (at both 1B and 3B). Guys are playing Howard at 1B all the time (4e14).
Even w/ all the errors, Ortiz only costs you eight or nine more runs than Thome or Howard over the course of the season. Does his offense make up for that? The answer is most likely, yes.
The gray area is the overall context of the situation. Is your team already poor defensively? What are the ratings at the other positions? How's the pitching? What do the oppostion ballparks and pitchers look like?
There's been a lot of handwringing about defense over the years, and I'm the first to admit that I always looked for an edge by being better on defense than the opposition. But as the cards continue to be more fairly priced, I think that it's no longer mandatory to be 1s and 2s all around and hiding a couple of 3s in the corners. Like [b:df68ed8d00]LMBombers[/b:df68ed8d00] said, the key is knowing how many runs a guy "gives back" with his glove and knowing whether his bat overcomes that figure.