Ummmm... I stink

[rgimbel]

a lot of the guys are very nice with excellent constructive criticsm. however to be blunt your last effort will look like the 27 yankees next to this team

[bleacher_creature]

[quote:67217e8455]I didn't think there were so many things to consider here. I agree with them all but I had no idea that this strat-o-matic game was this advanced.[/quote:67217e8455]

That is the greatest thing about playing here IMO. I've been playing the board game off and on for 20 years, and have owned the disk version too. I know baseball, have enough sense to order the ratings book for R/L card chances as opposed to just going by "splits" from ESPN or Yahoo. I consider my ballpark options and try to design my team in accordance, and still come in here and get taught lessons.

I really appreciate the high level of competition.

[goredsox33]

you can do alot worse then 75 wins for only your 2nd team.....

these posts are a great place to learn alot about how to play

[Jerlins]

Having the 4 at 2nd base isn't going to help matters. Would prefer a stronger set-up pitcher slanted to the right side than what you have. Having a 4 in RF won't help the pitching either. Hitting wise, you'll be competitive, just a few issues in the defense/pitching side is what is lacking. I have a difficult time playing a 3 at 2nd myself, let alone a 4. The team has some questions, but not a horrible job overall.