http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/atg2/team/team_other.html?user_id=101306
Or maybe the teams in my division are just better and hats off to them.
Dean
This team needs to go to underachievers anonyms...
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
This team needs to go to underachievers anonyms...
by Ruths ruffians » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:10 pm
- Ruths ruffians
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by raslavens » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:48 pm
Yes, the majority of your guys are underperforming. But it's only 24 games in for goodness' sake.
Don't be surprised if this team winds up under .500. It's a good team--not great--on paper, but decent competition and unlucky dice rolls can make a good team underachieve.
Don't be surprised if this team winds up under .500. It's a good team--not great--on paper, but decent competition and unlucky dice rolls can make a good team underachieve.
- raslavens
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by moulie13 » Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:46 pm
I think it is a very good team. I've won a championship in ATG 1 with pretty much the same pitching/hitting.
Not seeing the division/league I would have to say you will be .500 or better.
The only dislike I have is Boog, but he would be ok if the rest of the division are hitter parks.
Cobb, Red , and Mickey are all way underperforming, once they get on track the record will surely improve. IMO.
Good luck,
Boomer
Not seeing the division/league I would have to say you will be .500 or better.
The only dislike I have is Boog, but he would be ok if the rest of the division are hitter parks.
Cobb, Red , and Mickey are all way underperforming, once they get on track the record will surely improve. IMO.
Good luck,
Boomer
- moulie13
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by Palanion » Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:50 pm
Dean,
I can't imagine you panicking after only 24 games. Yes the offense is underachieving; with the good OBP on the team, I think there is room for a bounce back.
My one and only concern upon a one minute glance, is that your pen has been involved in 11 of the 24 decisions (3-8 ). That is an awfully heavy number. If they are going to be that involved, I would keep an eye on it for tweaking.
My personal method is to refrain from any roster changes within the first 54 games (1/3 of season). That way I get a good sampling of results, have played almost every league opponent, and can maybe pick out trends. So, if that was my team, I'd be watching those relief innings....
Bill :D
I can't imagine you panicking after only 24 games. Yes the offense is underachieving; with the good OBP on the team, I think there is room for a bounce back.
My one and only concern upon a one minute glance, is that your pen has been involved in 11 of the 24 decisions (3-8 ). That is an awfully heavy number. If they are going to be that involved, I would keep an eye on it for tweaking.
My personal method is to refrain from any roster changes within the first 54 games (1/3 of season). That way I get a good sampling of results, have played almost every league opponent, and can maybe pick out trends. So, if that was my team, I'd be watching those relief innings....
Bill :D
- Palanion
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by Ruths ruffians » Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:36 am
Thanks for the input all. Not really panicking, just thought the team would get off to a better start. I don't like to make any changes during the year unless I really feel that I have to. I will stick wiht this roster as I think that the talent is there.
Thanks
Dean
Thanks
Dean
- Ruths ruffians
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests