Theme League 69' Ultimate manager challenge

Our historical single season sets

Postby genegrid » Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:27 am

1. Pelzer SC
2. Ehlekev ID
3. LMBombers GA
4. Assmeriten-IL
5. Errormagnate Va
6. FAaron NY
7. BoDean-MO
8. Genegrid- IN
9.
10.
11.
12.
genegrid
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby genegrid » Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:32 am

I see that Cal does not have 5 SPs. How will that be handled?
genegrid
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby LARRYLANG » Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:45 am

nice observation Genegrid....I had not noticed that. I know Clyde Wright actually started alot that year but since he is not listed as a SP that is out. Let me do some exploring and I'll get back to you.
LARRYLANG
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby LARRYLANG » Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:56 am

OK guys --in checking out Genegrid's question I realized I overlooked the White Sox. They had a record of 68-94. I say lets just replace the Angels with the White Sox. So the east would be Clev-Phil-NY-and the White Sox. Is that agreeable with all??
LARRYLANG
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby LARRYLANG » Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:19 am

Here is another option and would probably be the best IMO. George Brunet started 19 games for Cal and only 11 for Seattle. Why not let the Angels have Brunet so they will have 5 starters. Seattle will still have plenty of SP. And since the White Sox were overlooked---Drop Boston and place the Yankees in the Central with the better teams and add the White Sox to the East. Divisions would now look like this:

East:
Cleveland 62-99
Philadelphia 63-99
Chicago WS 68-94
California 71-91 (With Brunet from the Pilots)

Central:

Washington 86-76
Houston 81-81
LA Dodgers 85-77
Yankees 80-81

West:

Seattle 64-98 (Minus Brunet who is an Angel)
KC 69-73
Montreal 52-110
San Diego 52-110

This seems the fairest way to go and by dropping Boston and moving the Yankees the divisions are pretty equal. How about it---What are your thoughts.
LARRYLANG
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby KEVINEHLE » Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:32 am

[quote:ce6703d3ac="Pelzer"]Here is another option and would probably be the best IMO. George Brunet started 19 games for Cal and only 11 for Seattle. Why not let the Angels have Brunet so they will have 5 starters. Seattle will still have plenty of SP. And since the White Sox were overlooked---Drop Boston and place the Yankees in the Central with the better teams and add the White Sox to the East. Divisions would now look like this:

East:
Cleveland 62-99
Philadelphia 63-99
Chicago WS 68-94
California 71-91 (With Brunet from the Pilots)

Central:

Washington 86-76
Houston 81-81
LA Dodgers 85-77
Yankees 80-81

West:

Seattle 64-98 (Minus Brunet who is an Angel)
KC 69-73
Montreal 52-110
San Diego 52-110

This seems the fairest way to go and by dropping Boston and moving the Yankees the divisions are pretty equal. How about it---What are your thoughts.[/quote:ce6703d3ac]


COUNT ME IN. REGARDLESS OF WHERE BRUNET IS OR WHAT TEAM I GET, I WILL END UP 71-91. I THINK THERE SHOULD BE A LOTTERY TO SEE WHO GETS TO PLAY IN MY DIVISION. TOP 3 WINNERS GET TO PLAY MY TEAM A LOT!!! :oops: kEV
KEVINEHLE
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby KEVINEHLE » Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:35 am

Just a note. It's great to see GeneGrid and FAaron in this league. They
are classic veterans in this game. We will have the best of the best playing. There is only one game I don't know so far. We will treat him with kindness............maybe!!! :twisted:
KEVINEHLE
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby CATom » Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:44 am

1. Pelzer SC
2. Ehlekev ID
3. LMBombers GA
4. Assmeriten-IL
5. Errormagnate Va
6. FAaron NY
7. BoDean-MO
8. Genegrid- IN
9. CATom - CA
10.
11.
12.

you talked me into it!! 3 to go!
CATom
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby genegrid » Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:53 am

I think that replacing Boston with the White Sox is a good move. Boston would definitely have been the favorite to win this.

Giving Brunet to the Angels would also be a good call.
genegrid
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby LMBombers » Wed Jan 25, 2006 12:35 pm

I like the change! This ought to be a fun league trying to win with these teams!
LMBombers
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: 1969, 1986, 1999

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests