ALIGNED COMBO FRANCHISE LEAGUE - FRANCHISES ANALYZED

Our historical single season sets

Postby CATom » Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:01 pm

1. Bobschwartz22 - GA
2. Genegrid (DH) - IN
3. Novie (DH) (PA)
4. CATom - DH - CA
5. ado_jake - DH - Illinois
6. Lumbercompanysouth DH - Tx
7. Pinhead1987 - DH - KY
8. Tomwistar- MO
9. FAaron - DH - NY
10.
11.
12

sill only need three.
CATom
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Recommended THEME

Postby rschwartz51 » Wed Feb 22, 2006 4:50 am

After reviewing all the suggestions I'm recommending the following:

1) Based on Lotto ( High to Low) Draft any 1 franchise.

2) Using Serpantine format, draft 2nd round of any remaining Franchises Pitching or Hitting Staff.

3) Final 3rd round, using format of 7,6,8,5,9,4,10,3,11,2,12,1 based on 1st rd selection, draft either remaining hitting or pitching staff depending on 2nd rd selection.

$100M cap
DH
NO Trading or FAs

My basic philosophy was to not select a method that any manager had said was a deal breaker. Two of these would have been to have a straight combo or to make it complicated.

There is 1 other option and that is an adjusted COMBO Aligned franchise. Using a CATom suggestion and modifying it to incorporate Novie and my findings I can offer this as an option:

1) Balt & SD - $133.08
2) Minn & Clev - $122.75
3) Atl & Stl ( Torre on Atl) - $133.03
4) Pitt & PhiN - $120.95
5) Cinn & Hst ( Morgan on Cinn) - $124.25
6) NYM & Mtl - $118.54
7) SF & ChiW -$120.06
8) NYY & wash - $122.61
9) Det & KC -$122.40
10) Oak & CA -$112.83
11) BOST & SEA -$115.09
12) Dodgers& Cubs - $117.04
rschwartz51
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby novie » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:23 pm

I'm good with whatever the rest want.
novie
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ado_jake » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:25 pm

Bob, I am OK with either your recommendation or the "adjusted" combined teams you outlined.
ado_jake
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby genegrid » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:27 pm

I'm also good with the new combo alignment or the 3 rd draft.
genegrid
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby CATom » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:29 pm

i'm ok with either, also :lol:
CATom
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby lumbercompanysouth » Wed Feb 22, 2006 4:30 pm

No preference here...
lumbercompanysouth
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby rschwartz51 » Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:21 pm

Note to everyone - I've read the 5 managers responses and went ahead and contacted the 3 other managers by PM to ask for their input as well.

All 6 managers responding at this point show no preference.

Since we will need to make a choice I wanted to indicate where my position is at this point:

1) I could go either way but as a premise I lean towards the pre selected combo franchises.

2) I do have a slight fear though that the odds are higher that with the Combo Franchises a low seed may be out there and the 11th or 12th pick may be not as competitive while I see little chance of that occuring with the other method.

3) If we either went the 3 round draft or if we did more research and maybe moved a player or so around or allowed trades a fair selection for everyone no matter what the draft choice could be held.

4) Just go with a choice and buyer beware. KISS is always a good way to go.

Please let me know your thoughts. Would like to get things set asap.
rschwartz51
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ado_jake » Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:27 pm

Then let's go with the pre selected combo franchises.

I have no fear of getting a bad cede and not being competitive. That is my standard operating procedure anyway. :lol:
ado_jake
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby tomwistar » Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:25 pm

My preference is to make things as fair as possible. I had one of the lower seeds in the combo league that just started, and there was a definite dropoff in quality between the first 6-7 teams drafted and the rest. Franchises like Chicago NL and Baltimore have only a couple holes to fill, while other franchises have gaping holes all over the place. I think the more we can do for parity, the better.
tomwistar
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: 1969, 1986, 1999

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron