by bkeat23 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:16 pm
[quote:7857b04bb3="Palanion"]By the way, DonFEEQ had it right. It was mentioned and ruled that since the nominating owner does not have to bid, then if someone fills his roster or a positional spot (hitter or pitcher) the owner still nominates, but does not bid.
I say we stick with Tippy, since there has been bidding, but I disagree with the next-in-line concept. If I had been the next one in line, you all would have just waited something like 17 hours for a nomination.
Bill[/quote:7857b04bb3]
That leaves us with a potential "no bid" scenario, which would have the person with 10 pitchers or 15 hitters to nominate another player, that may or may not attract any bids, and if no bids, then repeat with a different player.
If I am incorrect as to what was agreed upon, I'll put up Jenkins and not bid if I win Tippy.
Over the course of the months this will take, I'm not concerned with waiting for a nomination.
Mr. Boone to weigh in?
On pages 14-15 of the chat thread this was brought up, I may be misunderstanding the final ruling, if there was one.