by blueiguana » Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:20 pm
I think a lot of this has to do with Bonds's personality, and the general distaste that the press has for him (which he brings on himself, certainly). Players in the 1960's and 1970's (and beyond) used illegal amphetamines. McGwire and Sosa pretty clearly were using something. Yet they were given a pass by the press. No one asserted that greenies were cheating. When Bonds starts breaking records, all you hear is that he cheated, and that everyone should be alarmed. I think that the press has influenced public opinion to a great extent, not the other way around.
In my opinion, Bonds did not cheat, unless it is shown that he continued to use steroids after they were banned (admittedly, that seems likely). Prior to the ban, steroids were allowed by baseball, so their use did not break any written rules. Nor did use apparently break any unwritten rules -- there was no general outcry from the players to stop steroid use; indeed, the union fought the ban. Yes, they are illegal, but so are a host of other drugs that players use frequently without being labelled cheaters. If we consided use of greenies or marajuana to be cheating, then 85% of baseball players and 90% of NBA players would be cheaters!
Of course, if Bonds continued to use the steroids after the ban, then he was cheating, and he should be punished accordingly if he tests positive. If he were caught enough to get a lifetime ban, I would say that he should be denied the Hall of Fam, just like Pete Rose and Joe Jackson (who broke an explicit rule of baseball). Otherwise, treat his numbers however you want, but he was not a cheater.