RECESSION BUSTERS - 2004 - GEEKOR ANTI PICK

Anti-franchise pick for GEEKOR (S.F. Giants - 87)

 
Total votes : 0

RECESSION BUSTERS - 2004 - GEEKOR ANTI PICK

Postby ROBERTLATORRE » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:26 pm

THE POLL FUNCTION DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE!!!

Vote in this poll to select GEEKOR anti-franchise pairing.

The rosters of the 4 worst teams with pythW of 75 or higher are summarized here:

http://latorrer0.tripod.com/rbsom/2004.html

PLEASE ONLY VOTE IF YOU ARE A MANAGER IN THE RECESSION BUSTERS THEME LEAGUE.
Last edited by ROBERTLATORRE on Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ROBERTLATORRE
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Summary

Postby ROBERTLATORRE » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:29 pm

The Giants have a few needs - SS, C, RP, CL, C, CF

FLA - would add CL, 1 RPs, average CF, good fielding SS
BAL - would add stud SS and 4 quality RPs
CLE - would add stud SS, average CF, and 5 quality RPs
NYM - would add 4 quality RPs, a CL, but no real help in the lineup

I think that the Mets or Marlins would be the least help.
ROBERTLATORRE
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby geekor » Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:58 pm

so Cleveland it is :D



























































Just kidding you bastards :P
geekor
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby ggrover15 » Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:21 pm

so bring on the next vote...

I can not wait to see what team I get.... I figure I already know but can hope for better..... :)
ggrover15
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby DAVIDLEE 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:07 pm

i've been trying to figure who i get and none of the possibilities look promising
DAVIDLEE 2
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm


Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests