Finders Keepers Keeper League

[thisisray]

As for the future, Pirhala asked for a vote and he has the right to have one. On the proposal that we should change the rules and have set divisions that we change do not change from year to year.
Should we make this change?

1. litangel - NO
2. tcochran - NO
3. thisisray - NO
4. Kaviksdad
5. Roscodog
6. Pirhala NC - YES
7. ironwill1
8. RiojaDave
9. Rant
10.Terry101-
11. zim13
12. hawk-

[kimkrichbaum2]

On another topic, I would like to address Rant. Through a system glitch, Rant got two draft choices in round 25. I have come up with two proposals on how to deal with this:
1. Just let it go, Rant is a first timer for keeper leagues, and he caught a break. The choices were late enough that probably did not affect the balance of power. In this scenario, Rant would still have to drop a draft choice (probably his round 40) to stay at the 40 person roster limit, no other affects.
2. If we do address this, I don't want to screw Rant either, he dod not ask for this, and probably drafted by Proxy. He might well have gotten both of his 25's anyway of the draft had gone as normal. So the proposal is that of Rant's two round 25 picksand his round 26 pick, he drops one (Uggla, B. Molina, or Liriano) The next morning we have a pick 3, just like we used to determine original draft order. the winner can exchange any of their choices through round 30 for the player rant dropped. if they do not want to do this, then the player Rant dropped is now undraftable for this draft by anybody. If they do an exchange, the player they drop is now undraftable. this way, one of the 12 of us, gets a little bonus, and it is random as to gets that advantage.
VOTE (just a majority for this one)

[u:89422d7d57]Proposal 1: (Leave it as is)[/u:89422d7d57]

[u:89422d7d57]Proposal 2[/u:89422d7d57]
[u:89422d7d57]
Don't Care[/u:89422d7d57]
Litangel

I like both options about equally.

Just a note to Ray, we are co-comissioners, I figure when one of us takes up an issue they will act as commissioner for that issue. If you ever disagree with something I do, let me know. I have appreciated our teamwork so far.

[JAMESZIMMER]

Vote no to the change. Don't care about the Rant glitch.

[kaviksdad]

As for the future, Pirhala asked for a vote and he has the right to have one. On the proposal that we should change the rules and have set divisions that we change do not change from year to year.
Should we make this change?

1. litangel - NO
2. tcochran - NO
3. thisisray - NO
4. Kaviksdad - NO
5. Roscodog
6. Pirhala NC - YES
7. ironwill1
8. RiojaDave
9. Rant
10.Terry101-
11. zim13
12. hawk-

[tcochran]

On another topic, I would like to address Rant. Through a system glitch, Rant got two draft choices in round 25. I have come up with two proposals on how to deal with this:
1. Just let it go, Rant is a first timer for keeper leagues, and he caught a break. The choices were late enough that probably did not affect the balance of power. In this scenario, Rant would still have to drop a draft choice (probably his round 40) to stay at the 40 person roster limit, no other affects.
2. If we do address this, I don't want to screw Rant either, he dod not ask for this, and probably drafted by Proxy. He might well have gotten both of his 25's anyway of the draft had gone as normal. So the proposal is that of Rant's two round 25 picksand his round 26 pick, he drops one (Uggla, B. Molina, or Liriano) The next morning we have a pick 3, just like we used to determine original draft order. the winner can exchange any of their choices through round 30 for the player rant dropped. if they do not want to do this, then the player Rant dropped is now undraftable for this draft by anybody. If they do an exchange, the player they drop is now undraftable. this way, one of the 12 of us, gets a little bonus, and it is random as to gets that advantage.
VOTE (just a majority for this one)

Proposal 1: (Leave it as is)

Proposal 2

Don't Care
Litangel
tcochran

[kaviksdad]

On another topic, I would like to address Rant. Through a system glitch, Rant got two draft choices in round 25. I have come up with two proposals on how to deal with this:
1. Just let it go, Rant is a first timer for keeper leagues, and he caught a break. The choices were late enough that probably did not affect the balance of power. In this scenario, Rant would still have to drop a draft choice (probably his round 40) to stay at the 40 person roster limit, no other affects.
2. If we do address this, I don't want to screw Rant either, he dod not ask for this, and probably drafted by Proxy. He might well have gotten both of his 25's anyway of the draft had gone as normal. So the proposal is that of Rant's two round 25 picksand his round 26 pick, he drops one (Uggla, B. Molina, or Liriano) The next morning we have a pick 3, just like we used to determine original draft order. the winner can exchange any of their choices through round 30 for the player rant dropped. if they do not want to do this, then the player Rant dropped is now undraftable for this draft by anybody. If they do an exchange, the player they drop is now undraftable. this way, one of the 12 of us, gets a little bonus, and it is random as to gets that advantage.
VOTE (just a majority for this one)

Proposal 1: (Leave it as is)

Proposal 2

Don't Care
Litangel
tcochran
kaviksdad

[Pirhala]

On another topic, I would like to address Rant. Through a system glitch, Rant got two draft choices in round 25. I have come up with two proposals on how to deal with this:
1. Just let it go, Rant is a first timer for keeper leagues, and he caught a break. The choices were late enough that probably did not affect the balance of power. In this scenario, Rant would still have to drop a draft choice (probably his round 40) to stay at the 40 person roster limit, no other affects.
2. If we do address this, I don't want to screw Rant either, he dod not ask for this, and probably drafted by Proxy. He might well have gotten both of his 25's anyway of the draft had gone as normal. So the proposal is that of Rant's two round 25 picksand his round 26 pick, he drops one (Uggla, B. Molina, or Liriano) The next morning we have a pick 3, just like we used to determine original draft order. the winner can exchange any of their choices through round 30 for the player rant dropped. if they do not want to do this, then the player Rant dropped is now undraftable for this draft by anybody. If they do an exchange, the player they drop is now undraftable. this way, one of the 12 of us, gets a little bonus, and it is random as to gets that advantage.
VOTE (just a majority for this one)

Proposal 1: (Leave it as is)

Proposal 2

Don't Care
Litangel
tcochran
kaviksdad
Pirhala

[kimkrichbaum2]

As for the future, Pirhala asked for a vote and he has the right to have one. On the proposal that we should change the rules and have set divisions that we change do not change from year to year.
Should we make this change?

1. litangel - NO
2. tcochran - NO
3. thisisray - NO
4. Kaviksdad - NO
5. Roscodog
6. Pirhala NC - YES
7. ironwill1
8. RiojaDave
9. Rant
10.Terry101-
11. zim13 - NO
12. hawk-

This proposal needs 8 to pass, and already has 5 no's. so it has failed.

However, thanks for proposal Pirhala, this is how changes come about. This one just didn't pass.

On the round 25 Rant situation we have 4 "Don't Care's" unless we get atleast one vote for proposal 2, I will leave things as they are.

Proposal 1: (Leave it as is)

Proposal 2

Don't Care
Litangel
tcochran
kaviksdad
Pirhala
zim

[Pirhala]

Thanks for considering it guys. I love democracy,

[JAMESZIMMER]

For my next pick I'm taking Matt Antonelli but I'll be drafting Jim Thome. If Dave takes Thome than I'll take Big Papi.