by kimkrichbaum2 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 8:09 pm
I agree with PBTR's basic point, but I think it can be said in a softer, gentler, way. And I have said this to league's I belong to.
especially in 80 mil standard leagues, there is often a varied level of commitment among the managers, some may check their teams and mail twice a day, others, once a week or less. And I think we need to allow for that. People have lives outside of Strat.
I think it is more useful to have a trade protocol in an advanced league with experienced managers, especially those that lend themselves to trading like 2 1/2 team leagues and keepers.
In my ideal world, we would go beyond just a quick response to trades and have a thoughtful one. The key to a successful trade is finding out which players the two managers value differently from one another. i recently had a manager in a keeper league whom i traded with several times. We finally got stuck, and I sent him a 1-10 scale rating of how I valued all his players, and asked him to do the same. it turned out that we generally valued the same players, except he liked Ortiz and Andy LaRoche who had little value for me. I was able to trade them to him for a LH reliever and a couple of draft choices.
I don't ask, because I think it would be too detailed for a lot of folks, but I'd like to exchange wish and value lists before we even go to trading.