2008 Auction League - Chat

2008 Auction League - Chat

Postby gorshar » Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:32 am

Discuss...
gorshar
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby CATom » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:10 pm

still need 2 hitrs & 1 pit on the block!
CATom
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby kimkrichbaum2 » Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:28 pm

This Pujols bidding is so intense, I feel bad for the guy with the second highest bid, I mean he gets nothing. I say we give the runner up for Albert, a Luis Pujols card (Al's cousin), it could be in Luis's STUD year, 1981, when he hit .239 (with a .309 slugging pct.) :lol:
kimkrichbaum2
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Mr Baseball World » Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:44 pm

What would ya think about the possibility of having two seperate bidding threads-one for pitching and one for hitting?
Mr Baseball World
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby kimkrichbaum2 » Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:46 pm

I like it!
kimkrichbaum2
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Vote for 2 threads

Postby RiojaDave » Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:59 pm

so vote I
RiojaDave
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby DHowser » Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:52 pm

[quote:b0ef21031d="Mr. Baseball World"]What would ya think about the possibility of having two seperate bidding threads-one for pitching and one for hitting?[/quote:b0ef21031d]


definitely a good idea MR. BBW. Much easier.
DHowser
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby MEAT » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:32 am

im aware of it now...but if i'd read this thread, i;d assume it was still at the voting stage,,,
MEAT
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Duplicate bids

Postby gorshar » Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:35 pm

Okay, as de facto commissioner I'm laying down the law:

A bid is a bid. If it's duplicate or otherwise invalid in any way, so be it then, it doesn't count. Nobody is to assume what you meant. The first highest bid is the highest bid and if it stands unchallenged for 24 hours (site outages notwithstanding) the player is awarded to the *first* highest bid. Duplicate or otherwise invalid bids are the responsibility of the bidder to correct and no one else. Though simple gamesmanship would dictate we might point each others' errors out, the failure for someone to do so does not in any way change the invalidity of a bad bid. Site outages are not an excuse because your bid is there to see and amend from the moment you post it.

That's it. Done.
gorshar
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby MEAT » Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:01 pm

sorry, but one last bit of forensic protest on closing lincicum.
here's the time stamp on the original bidding thread, which clearly is where I looked for him and had been participating in bidding...

[quote:df871757b1][b:df871757b1]05 Oct 2009 02:10 [/b:df871757b1]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i THINK lincicum just closed, otherwise I bid 14.3.


here's the time stamp and bids including winning bid on thread i didn;t realize existed, but had they been made on original thread, I would have been well within time...

[/quote:df871757b1][b:df871757b1]Lincecum and Sabathia 04 Oct 2009 17:04

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lincecum 14.3 Riojadave
sabathia 7.5 Riojadave [/b:df871757b1]


ironwill1
MVP


[b:df871757b1]J 04 Oct 2009 17:29 [/b:df871757b1]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lincecum 14.6
[quote:df871757b1]

meanwhile. THIS was on the chat thread...

[b:df871757b1]Vote for 2 threads 03 Oct 2009 13:59

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
so vote I [/b:df871757b1][/quote:df871757b1]
MEAT
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Next

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron