jet40 - .68
hackra - .70
and winner [b:3e514dacf6]DHowser - .76[/b:3e514dacf6]
ATG 5 auction bidding
Brooks Robinson Results
by jet40 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:29 am
- jet40
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Red Faber Results
by jet40 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:31 am
only one bid on Red
[b:5783d0247a]jet40 - 1.33[/b:5783d0247a]
[b:5783d0247a]jet40 - 1.33[/b:5783d0247a]
- jet40
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Regarding Tied Bids
by jet40 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:02 am
Not wanting to ruffle any feathers as I am new to this league, I will give my opinion for what it is worth.
If two or more Gm's remain tied on a player I think it is foolish to award him to a GM that did not covet him as much as the deadlocked GM's. If for instance, two people bid 1 milliion on a player and are unwilling to go any higher, then a simple tie breaker is the easiest and fairest solution. We could have 1 uninvolved manager PM a number between 1 and 20 to another uninvolved manager. The managers vying for the player could then PM a third party their guess, with the closest winning the player with their original high bid.
If two or more Gm's remain tied on a player I think it is foolish to award him to a GM that did not covet him as much as the deadlocked GM's. If for instance, two people bid 1 milliion on a player and are unwilling to go any higher, then a simple tie breaker is the easiest and fairest solution. We could have 1 uninvolved manager PM a number between 1 and 20 to another uninvolved manager. The managers vying for the player could then PM a third party their guess, with the closest winning the player with their original high bid.
- jet40
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Robinson signs ... next up Jud Wilson
by DHowser » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:50 am
my opening bid on Wilson is 1.69
- DHowser
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
OK
by CATom » Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:22 pm
I like litangel's number 2 above - the card should be awarded to the FIRST person to either 1) have submitted the last bid OR 2) the first person to have submitted the "pass" bid. Should IN NO WAY be awarded to the lowest bid taken (or the NEXT to highest).
Tom.
Tom.
- CATom
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by hackra » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:34 pm
[quote:fe415f5dbf="litangel"]Whatever your feelings around the rule about ties, it is our current rulw, so Murphy is up for bid.
Some Ideas for the future, because I think this two passes after a tie situation is likely to happen several more times.
Idea 1 - after two passes the player is awarded to the owner with the most players left to draft at the last bid price. If the two owners are tied, then the player goes to the owner with the most cash left to spend.
Idea 2 - after two passes the player is awarded to the owner who bid first in the last round where there were actual bids (not passes)
I personally do not like the force people tp keep bidding idea, it could be too time consuming[/quote:fe415f5dbf]
Either of these sound fine to me. :roll:
Some Ideas for the future, because I think this two passes after a tie situation is likely to happen several more times.
Idea 1 - after two passes the player is awarded to the owner with the most players left to draft at the last bid price. If the two owners are tied, then the player goes to the owner with the most cash left to spend.
Idea 2 - after two passes the player is awarded to the owner who bid first in the last round where there were actual bids (not passes)
I personally do not like the force people tp keep bidding idea, it could be too time consuming[/quote:fe415f5dbf]
Either of these sound fine to me. :roll:
- hackra
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
Return to Individual League Chat
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests